Webcasts
All our webcasts can be viewed with the freely available RealPlayer.
Click to go to: recent and past webcasts; the audio podcast; or Duke on iTunes U.
Displaying matches on 'Supreme Court' (View all):
Webcasts
- The Role of the Supreme Court: Rhetoric v. Reality
October 7, 2009 - A Supreme Court litigator and Duke Law professors discussed the proper role of a Supreme Court Justice. - Supreme Court Preview
October 6, 2009 - Duke Law Professors Neil Siegel, Ernest Young, James Coleman, and Samuel Buell discussed important cases that the Supreme Court will hear in the upcoming term. - September, 2009
- Supreme Court Review
September 22, 2009 - Duke Law professors Neil Siegel, Stuart Benjamin, Guy-Uriel Charles, and Lisa Kern Griffin discussed some of the most important Supreme Court decisions from the October 2008 Term. - November, 2008
- Supreme Court Update
November 17, 2008 - Duke Law Professors Christopher Schroeder, Ernest Young, Katharine Bartlett, and Lisa Griffin discuss environmental law, preemption, anti-discrimination, and criminal-related cases. Sponsored by the Program in Public Law. - October, 2007
- Supreme Court Preview
Webcast | MP3 Download
October 1, 2007 - The Program in Public Law kicks off the academic year with a Supreme Court Preview. Duke Law Professors Curt Bradley, Neil Siegel, James Coleman, and Catherine Fisk discuss important cases that the Supreme Court will hear in the upcoming term, including the Guantanamo cases and Medellin, as well as some significant employment discrimination, election, and criminal procedure cases. - April, 2006
- Distinctive Aspects of American Law Documentary Series: Van Orden v. Perry
April 22, 2006 - Professor Thomas Metzloff presents his latest documentary on Van Orden v. Perry, a landmark Supreme Court case that tested the limits of church and state. Through interviews with the people involved, including Van Orden, Duke Law Professor Erwin Chemerinsky (who argued Van Orden's case before the Court), and Texas Solicitor General Ted Cruz, the video explores the factual and legal underpinnings of the case, its path to the U.S. Supreme Court, and its effects on the people involved. Following the video, Professor Metzloff will lead a discussion of the Court's decision and the current legal landscape of the Establishment Clause - The Supreme Court in Transition
April 22, 2006 - Join Duke Law professors and constitutional law scholars Erwin Chemerinsky and Neil Siegel as well as a panel of your alumni peers as they discuss current issues of the US Supreme Court. - January, 2006
- What's On the Supreme Court Docket?
January 25, 2006 - The Program in Public Law invites you to a discussion of the most significant cases pending before the Supreme Court this term. - August, 2005
- Who is John Roberts?
August 31, 2005 - The American Constitution Society features a debate between Erwin Chemerinsky and Adam Charnes, a Partner at Kilpatrick Stockton, on the nomination of Judge John Roberts to the United States Supreme Court. - April, 2005
- Reforming the Supreme Court? - Bringing About Change
April 9, 2005 - Is prolonged tenure for Supreme Court Justices a problem in today's circumstances, and if so, what should be done? Topics explored during this conference will include: Contemporary Consequences of Life Tenure; Are These Consequences Problematic Under Today's Circumstances?; Examining Possible Solutions; Bringing Change About. Panelists: John C. Harrison, University of Virginia School of Law (constitutional issues) Alan Morrison, Stanford University Law School (legislative process) Robert R. Nagel, Univ. of Colorado School of Law (assessing alternatives) William Van Alstyne, William and Mary School of Law (assessing alternatives) - Reforming the Supreme Court? - Examining Possible Solutions
April 9, 2005 - Is prolonged tenure for Supreme Court Justices a problem in today's circumstances, and if so, what should be done? Topics explored during this conference will include: Contemporary Consequences of Life Tenure; Are These Consequences Problematic Under Today's Circumstances?; Examining Possible Solutions; Bringing Change About. Panelists: David J. Garrow, Emory Univ. Sch. of Law (attacking stat. approaches) James Lindgren, Northwestern Univ. School of Law (strategic behavior) Sanford Levinson, University of Texas School of Law (assessing alternatives) Arthur D. Hellman, University of Pittsburgh Law School (assessing alternatives) - Reforming the Supreme Court? - Are These Consequences Problematic Under Today's Circumstances
April 9, 2005 - Is prolonged tenure for Supreme Court Justices a problem in today's circumstances, and if so, what should be done? Topics explored during this conference will include: Contemporary Consequences of Life Tenure; Are These Consequences Problematic Under Today's Circumstances?; Examining Possible Solutions; Bringing Change About. Panelists: Paul D. Carrington, Duke University School of Law L. A. Scot Powe, Jr., University of Texas School of Law Thomas W. Merrill, Columbia University School of Law Daniel J. Meador, University of Virginia School of Law - Reforming the Supreme Court? - Contemporary Consequences of Life Tenure
April 9, 2005 - Is prolonged tenure for Supreme Court Justices a problem in today's circumstances, and if so, what should be done? Topics explored during this conference will include: Contemporary Consequences of Life Tenure; Are These Consequences Problematic Under Today's Circumstances?; Examining Possible Solutions; Bringing Change About. Panelists: Steven G. Calabresi, Northwestern University School of Law Ward Farnsworth, Boston University School of Law - September, 2004
- Preview of the Upcoming Supreme Court Term
September 27, 2004 - With Professors Erwin Chemerinsky and Neil Siegel. Sponsored by the Program in Public Law. - Interrogation, Detention, and the Powers of the Executive - A Series of Roundtables (part 1)
September 17, 2004 - Sponsored by the Program in Public Law. A day-long conversation regarding some important issues raised during last year's Supreme Court Roundtable 1 - "Detention: Under What Circumstances Can Individuals Be Detained?" Featuring: Chris Schroeder, Eric Muller, John Harrison, Adam Charnes - Interrogation, Detention, and the Powers of the Executive - A Series of Roundtables (part 2)
September 17, 2004 - Sponsored by the Program in Public Law. A day-long conversation regarding some important issues raised during last year's Supreme Court Roundtable 2 - "Interrogation: What is Permissible Under Constitutional, Statutory, and International Law?" Featuring: Neil Kinkopf, Carlos Vazquez, Marty Lederman, Scott Silliman - Interrogation, Detention, and the Powers of the Executive - A Series of Roundtables (part 3)
September 17, 2004 - Sponsored by the Program in Public Law. A day-long conversation regarding some important issues raised during last year's Supreme Court. Roundtable 3 - "Powers of the Executive" Featuring: William Marshall, H. Jefferson Powell, David Barron, Erwin Chemerinsky - Interrogation, Detention, and the Powers of the Executive - A Series of Roundtables (part 4)
September 17, 2004 - Sponsored by the Program in Public Law. A day-long conversation regarding some important issues raised during last year's Supreme Court. Roundtable 4 - "The Role of Lawyers in the War on Terrorism" Featuring: Dawn Johnsen, Randy Moss, John O. McGinnis, Nina Pillard, Walter Dellinger - January, 2003
- Ken Starr '73
January 13, 2003 - Ken Starr '73 leads discussion of his new book, First Among Equals: The Supreme Court in American Life
