Duke Law

Syllabus: Science and Scientists

EN 2252                  L. Schachterle
Science and Scientists in Modern Literature Project Center
Term C; SL 105-- 3:30 pm


 INTRODUCTION 

EN 2252 provides an introduction to reading selected works of fiction for 
thematic content. The theme of this course is how writers depict science and 
scientists, but what you learn about identifying and contrasting themes 
should be useful in your own reading as well as in preparing the theme for 
the final Sufficiency essay.

 OBJECTIVES

 1. Help students develop an ability to identify and discuss important 
themes in works of literature, and to compare and contrast these themes in 
different texts.
 2. Help to articulate ideas about these themes in written and oral 
forms. Team oral presentations will be emphasized.
 3. Provide an introduction to how science and technology are discussed 
in literature: does science have an ideology and an ethics?

 GRADING

Grades for this course will be based on class participation and on seven 
marks: two hour exams, two short essays (3-5 pages), class participation, 
and a team oral presentation (separate grades for team and individuals).
ALl seven activities must be completed to receive a grade for EN 2252.

Note: to participate in class, you must be there.

The hour exams will be open book (but with no notes or secondary sources) 
and will consist of identifying and discussing major passages from the books 
read. You should read your texts carefully, and in preparing for classes and 
the exams, underline passages which seem important thematically.

 BOOK LIST
Shelley, Frankenstein 

Pirsig, Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance

Huxley, Brave New World Brecht, Galileo

Pynchon, The Crying of Lot 49 Duerrenmatt, The Physicists
 

 SYLLABUS

January
11 Introduction
12 The "Two Cultures" Debate: C. P. Snow, scientist and artist

15 Frankenstein, Preface-ch. 4 (author and character)
16       " chs. 5-11 (character and plot)
18 " chs. 12-19 (plot and structure)
19 " chs. 20-end (theme: Asimov, "The Damned Frankenstein 
                                                 Complex"

22 Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, chs. 1-7; First essay 
        due: "Authors often use one or more pairs of characters to contrast, 
in important ways, the points they are making about the central character. 
Discuss three important character contrasts in the novel Frankenstein with 
respect to helping the reader most fully understand the character and role 
of Victor."
23 " chs. 8-12 
25 chs. 13-17 
26 chs. 18-24

29 chs. 25-28
30 chs. 29-end
February
1 EXAM ONE for first two books 
2 Brave New World 

5        " 
6        " 
8       The Physicists, Act 1
9        " Act 2

12       " "21 Points of The Physicsts"; Galileo, Introduction
13 Galileo, scenes 1-5
(15==WPI Academic Advising Day; no classes held)
16       " , scenes 6-12

19 " , conclusion; Brecht's essays at the end
20 The Crying of Lot 49 
22 " Second essay due: "Joseph Rotblat, a nuclear physicist who 
founded the Pugwash Conference, won the 1995 Nobel Peace Prize. Using some 
materials distributed in class, discuss what you believe are the 
responsibilities of scientists to society by analyzing at least three of the 
narratives discussed in this course."
23 "

26 "
27 "
29      EXAM TWO ON LAST FOUR BOOKS (Three questions will be from the last 
book, to help you to decide how carefully to read it!) 



POINTERS FOR ORAL PRESENTATIONS:

1) Prepare individually and as a team, with a FIVE MINUTE MAXIMUM per 
person. Everyone must participate equally.

2) Rehearse several times. Making a good oral presentation is hard, but may 
be the most important thing you take away from this course professionally.
When rehearsing, critique each other for such factors as

        o quality of projection (can you hear the speaker? does he or she 
         look at you?) 
        o pace--too fast or too slow?
        o avoidance of mannerisms like "UMMMM," "you know," slang, etc.
        
3) Be imaginative in how you organize the presentation. Props, visuals and 
handouts are welcome. Avoid "talking heads"! 

4) You do not need to dress formally, but you must be reasonably 
presentable. Note: wearing a cap indoors is not presentable.

GRADING.

I assume for many of you, this will be the first occasion to speak before 
college classmates. Grading will be generous; a "B" is the norm. If you 
have severe stage fright or other impediments, please feel free to see me.

POINTERS FOR WRITTEN PRESENTATIONS

All essays will be graded equally for content and expression--qualities that 
really cannot be separated intelligently. Students with difficulties in 
writing should consult with me, or with the WPI Writing Resources Center or 
WRC (in Salisbury Labs), for help in oral and written communications.
 
Footnotes will be reviewed in class. Please use the following form:
Mary Shelley, Frankenstein (NY: Signet Classic, 1968), pp. 10-11.

ALL essays should be word-processed and spell-checked, and must be easily 
legible (no worn ribbons!). 

Do not repeat the plot for its own sake, or to take up space. I have 
already read the books, and do not need to be reminded what happened. 
Analyze the stories; do not retell them!

The following errors are common, and should be avoided. Most dictionaries 
will have brief grammar sections you can review, or check in the WRC. 
Credit will be deducted for making such errors on formal essays.

1. Possessives and plurals-- the former use apostrophes ('); the latter do 
not.

2. Affect/effect. The former is usually a verb; the latter is usually a 
noun.

3. Semicolons (;). This punctuation mark joins together two complete and 
separate sentences (as in #1 and #2 above). Learn to use this mark 
correctly; don't confuse it with the colon (:) which usually introduces a 
list--not a separate new sentence.

4. ITS/IT'S. A very easy confusion. Just remember that ITS is the 
possessive of IT (just like HIS or HERS, without the apostrophe). IT'S is 
the contraction of IT IS.

Informal essays (written in class as quizzes or otherwise) will be graded 
for spelling and grammar, but not as stringently as formal essays.

GRADING OVERALL. EN 2252 is intended to be a reasonably easy course to 
pass, but a hard course in which to get an "A." I reserve "A"'s for the top 
20% or so of the class who CONSISTENTLY show original, thoughtful, high 
quality productivity throughout the course.

 *********

EXAM STRUCTURE. Both exams you take in this course will have the following 
instructions, followed by 4 passages.

 Choose three of the four quotations below to discuss. For each passage, 
 indicate in a brief essay why the passage is thematically important to 
 the book from which it was taken--that is, how the ideas presented in 
 the passage illustrate concerns central to this course. You may combine 
 two or even all three questions together into longer essays, or deal 
 with each of the three questions separately.

Whichever strategy you follow, try wherever possible to refer to other 
 passages in the book which are thematically related to this passage.


However, I reserve the right occasionally to give an alternative question.

 Department of Humanities Statement on
 Documenting Sources and Avoiding Plagiarism


DOCUMENTING SOURCES:

Research papers, sufficiency projects, and other writing that incorporates 
 information or ideas from sources must include suitable documentation of 
 the sources.

You must provide documentation:
 --when quoting directly from a source, that is, copying the words of 
 another;
 --when paraphrasing ideas or information from a source, that is, 
 rewriting a passage in your own words;
 --when incorporating into your paper information or ideas that are not 
 general knowledge (or discussed in class).

The documentation may take one of the following forms:
 --parenthetical citations in your text following the borrowed passages, 
 plus at the end of your paper a list of works cited.
 --footnotes or endnotes, that is, raised numbers following the borrowed 
 passages in your text, plus citations either at the bottom of your pages 
 or at the end of your paper.

By documenting your sources:
 --you demonstrate to your reader how your own ideas stem from, differ 
 from, or relate to those in your sources;
 --you support your ideas by showing that authorities in the field have 
 held similar ideas;
 --you assist your reader, who may want to look further into the sources 
 that you found helpful;
 --you share intellectual activity honestly and properly.


AVOIDING PLAGIARISM:

Plagiarism is using the words or ideas of another without properly 
 documenting them. The WPI Student Conduct Policies booklet clearly 
 specifies that plagiarism, the misrepresentation of the work of another 
 as your own, is an act of academic dishonesty. It is also academically 
 dishonest to allow another person to copy your work and present it as 
 his or her own work. Cases of deliberate plagiarism can result in loss 
 of credit for the assignment or for the course or project during which 
 plagiarism is committed. A serious act of plagiarism can result in the 
 student's suspension from WPI.

Students will avoid plagiarism by learning to use and document sources 
 correctly.