Commentary
Click on the case name for commentary about the practical and legal implications of the Supreme Court decision.
- American Insurance Assn. v. Garamendi
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White
- Burton v. Stewart
- Carey v. Musladin
- Cheney v. United States District Court
- Cunningham v. California
- Dura Pharmaceuticals v. Broudo
- Engine Manufacturers Ass’n v. South Coast Air Quality Management District
- Exxon Mobile Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.
- F. Hoffman-La Roche v. Empagran, S.A.
- Garcetti v. Ceballos
- Georgia v. Randolph
- Granholm v. Heald
- Gratz v. Bollinger
- Grutter v. Bollinger
- Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
- Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court
- Jones v. Bock
- Kelo v. City of New London
- Lawrence v. Florida
- Lawrence v. Texas
- Locke v. Davey
- Lopez v. Gonzales & Toledo-Flores v. United States
- Mayle v. Felix
- McCreary County, Kentucky v. American Civil Liberties Union
- MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.
- Merck KGaA v. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd.
- MGM v. Grokster
- Phillip Morris USA v. Williams
- Planned Parenthood v. Gonzales
- Rasul v. Bush & Al Odah v. United States
- Rumsfeld v. FAIR
- Rumsfeld v. Padilla
- Safeco Ins. Co. of America v. Burr
- Scott v. Harris
- Sell v. United States
- Smith v. City of Jackson, Mississippi
- United Haulers Ass'n v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Mgmt. Auth. 1
- United States v. American Library Assn.
- United States v. Booker & United States v. Fanfan
- Van Orden v. Perry
- Wharton v. Bockting
- Winkelman v. Parma City School District
