Case List
- Abdul-Kabir v. Quarterman & Brewer v. Quarterman (consolidated)
- Abdur’rahman v. Bell
- Aetna Health, Inc. v. Davila & Cigna Healthcare of Texas v. Calad (consolidated)
- Alaska v. United States
- Alaska Dep’t of Environmental Conservation v. E.P.A.
- Ali v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
- American Insurance Assn. v. Garamendi [commentary]
- American Trucking Assns. v. Michigan Public Serv. Commn. & Mid-Con Freight Systems v. Michigan public Serv. Commn. (consolidated)
- Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp.
- Arbaugh v. Y&H Corp.
- Arlington Central School Dist. v. Murphy
- Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States [ edited opinion]
- Archer v. Warner
- Arizona v. Gant
- Arkansas Dept. of Human Servs. v. Ahlborn
- Ashcroft v. ACLU [ edited opinion]
- Ayers v. Belmontes
- Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England
- Baldwin v. Reese
- Ballard et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue & Estate of Kanter v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (consolidated)
- Barnhart v. Peabody Coal Co.
- Barnhart v. Thomas
- Bates v. Dow Agroscience
- Baze v. Rees
- Beard v. Banks
- Beck v. Pace International Union
- Begay v. United States
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
- Beneficial National Bank v. Anderson
- Benitez v. Mata & Crawford v. Martinez (consolidated)
- Bell v. Thompson
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. Nord
- Board of Education of the City of New York v. Tom F.
- Boeing Co. v. United States
- Borden Ranch Partnership v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
- Boulware v. United States
- Boumediene v. Bush & Al Odah v. United States (consolidated) [ edited opinion]
- Bowles v. Russell
- BP America Production Co. v. Burton
- Bradshaw v. Stumpf
- Branch v. Smith
- Brendlin v. California
- Breuer v. Jim’s Concrete of Brevard
- Bridge v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity
- Brigham City v. Stuart
- Brown v. Legal Foundation of Washington
- Brown v. Payton
- Brown v. Sanders
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna
- Burgess v. United States
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railroad v. White [commentary]
- Burton v. Stewart [commentary]
- California Franchise Tax Board v. Hyatt
- Carey v. Musladin [commentary]
- Castle Rock, Colorado v. Gonzales [ edited opinion]
- CBOCs West, Inc. v. Humphries
- Central Laborers' Pension v. Heinz
- Central Virginia Comm. College v. Katz
- Chamber of Commerce v. Brown
- Chavez v. Martinez
- Cheney v. United States District Court [ commentary] [ edited opinion]
- Cherokee Nation of Okla. v. Thompson & Thompson v. Cherokee Nation of Okla. (consolidated)
- City of Cuyahoga Falls v. Buckeye Community Hope
- City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. Abrams
- City of Sherrill, NY v. Oneida Indian Nation
- Clackamas Gastroenterology v. Wells
- Claiborne v. United States
- Clark v. Arizona
- Clark v. Martinez & Benitez v. Rozos (consolidated)
- Clay v. United States
- Clingman v. Beaver
- Cohen v. California [edited opinion]
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Banks & Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Banaitis (consolidated)
- Connecticut Dept. of Public Safety v. Doe
- Cook County v. Chandler
- Cooper Industries v. Aviall Services
- Crawford v. Marion City Election Board & Indiana Democratic Party v. Rokita (consolidated)
- Credit Suisse First Boston Ltd. v. Billing
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Georgia State Board of Equalization
- Cuellar v. United States
- Cunningham v. California [commentary]
- Cutter v. Wilkinson [ edited opinion]
- Dada v. Mukasey
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno & Wilkins v. Cuno (consolidated)
- Danforth v. Minnesota
- Dastar Corporation v. Twentieth Century Fox Film
- Davenport v. Washington Education Assoc. & Washington v. Washington Education Assoc. (consolidated)
- Davis v. Federal Election Commission
- Davis v. Washington
- Day v. McDonough
- Dead Sea Bromine Co. v. Patrickson
- Deck v. Missouri
- Demore v. Kim
- Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. Davis
- Department of Transportation v. Public Citizen [ edited opinion]
- Department of Treasury v. Chicago
- Desert Palace v. Costa
- Devenpeck v. Alford
- District of Columbia v. Heller
- Dixon v. United States
- Dodd v. United States
- Dolan v. United States
- Dole Food Co. v. Patrickson
- Domino's Pizza v. McDonald
- Dow Chemical Company v. Stephenson
- Dura Phamaceuticals v. Broudo [commentary]
- eBay v. MercExchange
- EC Term of Years Trust v. United States
- Eldred v. Ashcroft
- Empire Healthcare Assurance v. McVeigh
- Engine Manufacturers Assn v. South Coast Air Quality Management District [commentary] [edited opinion]
- Engquist v. Oregon Dept. of Agriculture
- Entergy Louisiana, Inc. v. Louisiana Public Serv. Comm.
- Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corp.
- Evans v. Chavis
- Ewing v. California
- Exxon Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc. & Ortega v. Star-Kist Foods, Inc. (consolidated)[commentary]
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.
- F.Hoffman-La Roche v. Empagran [ commentary]
- FCC v. NextWave Personal Communications
- FEC v. Beaumont
- Federal Election Commision v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. & McCain v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. (consolidated)
- Federal Express Corp. v. Holowecki
- Fellers v. United States
- Fernandez-Vargas v. Gonzales
- Fitzgerald v. Racing Assoc. of Central Iowa
- Florida v. Nixon
- Florida Department of Revenue v. Piccadilly Cafeterias
- Ford Motor Co. v. McCauley
- Frew v. Hawkins
- Fry v. Pliler
- Gall v. United States
- General Dynamic Land Systems v. Cline
- Georgia v. Ashcroft
- Garcetti v. Ceballos [commentary] [edited opinion]
- Georgia v. Randolph [commentary] [edited opinion]
- Giles v. California
- Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v. Metrophones Telecommunications, Inc.
- Gomez-Perez v. Potter [edited opinion]
- Gonzales v. Carhart
- Gonzales v. Duenas-Alvarez
- Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita
- Gonzales v. Oregon [ edited opinion]
- Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood
- Gonzales v. Raich [ edited opinion]
- Gonzalez v. Crosby
- Gonzalez v. United States
- Grable & Sons Metal Products v. Darue Engineering
- Graham County Water District v. United States
- Granholm v. Heald, Michigan Beer & Wine Wholesalers Ass'n v. Heald, & Swedenburg v. Kelly (consolidated) [ commentary] [edited opinion]
- Gratz v. Bollinger [commentary] [edited opinion]
- Greenlaw v. United States
- Green Tree Financial Corp. v. Bazzle
- Grutter v. Bollinger [commentary] [edited opinion]
- Halbert v. Michigan
- Hall Street Associates LLC v. Mattel, Inc.
- Hamdan v. Rumsfeld [edited opinion]
- Hamdi v. Rumsfeld [ commentary] [ edited opinion]
- Hammon v. Indiana
- Hans v. Louisiana [edited opinion]
- Hartman v. Moore
- Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation
- Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court [ commentary] [ edited opinion]
- Hill v. McDonough
- Hillside Dairy v. Lyons & Ponderosa Dairy v. Lyons, Jr.
- Hinck v. United States
- Holmes v. South Carolina
- House v. Bell
- Howard Delivery Serv. v. Zurich American Ins. Co.
- Howell v. Mississippi
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
- Hudson v. Michigan
- IBP v. Alvarez & Tum v. Barber Foods (consolidated)
- Illinois v. Caballes
- Illinois v. Lidster
- Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc
- Indiana v. Edwards
- Inyo County v. Paiute-Shoshone Indians
- Irizarry v. United States
- Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education
- Jama v. Immingration & Customs Enforcement
- James v. United States
- Jinks v. Richland County
- Johanns v. Livestock Marketing Ass’n & Nebraska Cattlemen, Inc. v. Livestock Marketing Ass’n (consolidated)
- John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States
- Johnson (Jay Shawn) v. California (2003 term)
- Johnson (Jay Shawn) v. California (2004 term)
- Johnson (Garrison S.) v. California (2004 term)
- Johnson v. United States
- Jones v. Bock & Williams v. Overton (consolidated) [commentary]
- Jones v. Flowers
- Kansas v. Colorado
- Kansas v. Marsh
- Kelo v. City of New London [commentary] [ edited opinion]
- Kennedy v. Louisiana
- Kentucky Assn. of Health Plans v. Miller
- Kentucky Retirement Systems v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Kimbrough v. United States
- Kircher v. Putnam Funds Trust
- Knight v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
- Kodak v. Image Technical Services [edited opnion]
- Koons Buick v. Nigh
- Kowalski v. Tesmer
- KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. Lasting Impression I, Inc.
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.
- Laboratory Corp. of America v. Metabolite Laborities, Inc.
- Lamie v. U.S.Trustee
- LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg & Associates Inc.
- Lawrence v. Florida [commentary]
- Lawrence v. Texas [commentary] [edited opinion]
- Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc.
- Leegin Creative Leather Products v. PSKS, Inc.
- Leocal v. Ashcroft
- Limtiaco v. Camacho
- Lincoln Property Co. v. Roche
- Lingle v. Chevron U.S.A.
- Locke v. Davey [commentary] [edited opinion]
- Lockhart v. United States
- Lockyer v. Andrade
- Logan v. United States
- Long Island Care at Home v. Coke
- Lopez v. Gonzalez & Toledo v. United States (consolidated) [commentary]
- Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife [edited opinion]
- Madigan v. Telemarketing Associates
- Major League Baseball Players Association v. Steve Garvey [edited opinion]
- Marbury v. Madison [edited opinion]
- Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Massachusetts
- Marshall v. Marshall
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.
- Maryland v. Pringle
- Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency
- Massaro v. United States
- Mayle v. Felix [commentary] [edited opinion]
- McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n (the BCRA cases)
- McCreary County, KY v. ACLU [ commentary] [ edited opinion]
- Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Lab
- Medellin v. Dretke
- Medellin v. Texas [edited opinion]
- Medical Board v. Hason
- MedImmune v. Genentech [commentary]
- Meadwestvaco Corp. v. Illinois Dept. of Revenue
- Merck KGaA v. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd. [commentary] [edited opinion]
- Merrill Lynch v. Dabit
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Glenn
- Meyer v. Holley
- MGM Studios v. Grokster [ commentary] [ edited opinion]
- Microsoft Corp. v. AT&T Corp.
- Miller-El v. Cockrell
- Miller-El v. Dretke [ edited opinion]
- Missouri v. Seibert [ edited opinion]
- Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Williams
- Morgan Stanley Capital Group v. Public Utility Dist. 1 & Calpine Energy Services v. Public Utility Dist. 1 (consolidated)
- Morse v. Frederick [edited opinion]
- Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc.
- Muehler v. Mena
- Munaf v. Geren & Geren v. Omar (consolidated)
- National Association of Home Builders v. Defenders of Wildlife & Environmental Protection Agency v. Defenders of Wildlife (consolidated)
- National Cable & Telecom. Ass'n v. Brand X Internet Servs. & Federal Communications Commission v. Brand X Internet Servs.
- National Park Hospitality Assn. v. Department of Interior
- Nevada Dept. of Human Resources v. Hibbs
- New Jersey v. Delaware
- New York Board of Elections v. Torres
- Nguyen v. United States & Phan v. United States
- Nike, Inc. vs. Kasky
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Ayers
- Norfolk Southern Railway v. Kirby
- Norfolk Southern Railway v. Sorrell
- Northern Insurance Co. of New York v. Chatham County, Georgia
- Office of Independent Counsel v. Favish
- Office of Senator Mark Dayton v. Hanson
- Oregon v. Guzek
- Orff v. United States
- Osborn v. Haley
- Overton v. Bazzetta
- Pace v. DiGuglielmo
- Pacificare Health Systems v. Book
- Panetti v. Quarterman
- Parents Involved v. Seattle School District & Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education (consolidated)
- Pasquantino v. United States
- Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders
- Permanent Mission of India v. City of New York
- Pharmaceutical Research & Mfrs. of America v. Walsh
- Philippines v. Pimentel
- Philip Morris USA v. Williams [commentary]
- Pierce County v. Guillen
- Plains Commerce Bank v. Long Family Land & Cattle, Inc.
- Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. v. Gonzales [commentary]
- Powerex Corp. v. Reliant Energy Servs.
- Preston v. Ferrer
- Price v. Vincent
- Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc.
- Randall v. Sorrell, Vermont Republican State Comm. v. Sorrell, and Sorrell v. Randall (consolidated)[edited opinion]
- Rapanos v. United States & Carabell v. Army Corps of Engineers (consolidated)
- Rasul v. Bush & Al Odah v. United States [ commentary] [edited opinion]
- Riegel v. Medtronic Inc.
- Rhines v. Weber
- Rice v. Collins
- Richlin Security Service v. Chertoff
- Riley v. Kennedy
- Rita v. United States
- Rockwell International v. United States ex re. Stone
- Roell v. Withrow
- Rompilla v. Beard
- Roper v. Simmons
- Roper v. Weaver
- Rothgery v. Gillespie County
- Rowe v. New Hampshire Motor Transport Ass'n
- Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights [commentary] [ edited opinion]
- Rumsfeld v. Padilla [ commentary] [ edited opinion]
- Safeco Insurance Co. v. Burr & Geico General Insurance Co. v. Edo (consolidated) [commentary]
- Samson v. California
- Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon & Bustillo v. Johnson (consolidated)
- San Remo Hotel v. San Francisco
- Sattazahn v. Pennsylvania
- Scarborough v. Principi
- Schaffer v. Weast
- Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, Inc. (2002 term)
- Scheidler v. NOW & Operation Rescue v. NOW (consolidated) (2005 term)
- Schriro v. Landrigan
- Schiro v. Summerlin
- Scott v. Harris [commentary]
- Sell v. United States [commentary] [edited opinion]
- Sereboff v. MidAtlantic Medical Services
- S.D. Warren Co. v. Maine Department of Environmental Protection
- Shepard v. United States
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia Int’l Shipping
- Slaughter-house Cases [edited opinion]
- Small v. United States
- Smith v. Doe
- Smith v. Jackson, Mississippi [commentary] [edited opinion]
- Smith v. Massachusetts
- Smith v. Texas
- Snyder v. Louisiana
- Sole v. Wyner
- Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Norton
- Spector v. Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd.
- Sprietsma v. Mercury Marine
- Sprint Communications v. APCC Services
- Sprint/United Management Co. v. Mendelsohn
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Campbell
- Stewart v. Dutra Construction Co.
- Stogner v. California
- Stoneridge Investment v. Scientific Atlanta
- Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. Henson
- Taylor v. Sturgell
- Tellabs v. Makor Issues & Rights
- Tenet v. Doe
- Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assoc. v. Brentwood
- Texaco, Inc. v. Daugher & Shell Oil Co. v. Daugher (consolidated)
- Texas Redistricting Cases: League of United Latin America Citizens v. Perry, Travis County Texas v. Perry, Jackson v. Perry, GI Forum of Texas v. Perry (consolidated)
- Tory v. Cochran
- Travelers Casualty v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
- United Haulers Assoc. v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Mgmt. Authority 1 [commentary]
- United States v. American Library Association [commentary] [edited opinion]
- United States v. Alvarez-Machain & Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain
- United States v. Atlantic Research Corp.
- United States v. Banks
- United States v. Bean
- United States v. Benitez
- United States v. Booker & United States v. Fanfan (consolidated) [ commentary]
- United States v. Clintwood Elkhorn Mining
- United States v. Georgia & Goodman v. Georgia (consolidated)
- United States v. Gonzales-Lopez
- United States v. Grubbs
- United States v. Navajo Nation
- United States v. Olson
- United States v. Patane [ edited opinion]
- United States v. Recio
- United States v. Resendiz-Ponce
- United States v. Ressam
- United States v. Rodriquez
- United States v. Santos
- United States v. White Mountain Apache Tribe
- United States v. Williams
- United States Department of Transportation v. Public Citizen
- United States Postal Service v. Flamingo Industries
- Unitherm Food Sys. v. Swift-Eckrich
- Uttecht v. Brown
- Van Orden v. Perry [ ] [ edited opinion]
- Virginia v. Black
- Virginia v. Hicks [edited opinion]
- Virginia v. Moore
- Volvo Trucks North America v. Reeder-Simco GMC
- Wachovia Bank v. Schmidt
- Wagnon v. Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation
- Wallace v. Chicago
- Watson v. Philip Morris Co.
- Watters v. Wachovia Bank
- Washington v. Recuenco
- Washington State Dept. of Soc. & Health Servs. v. Guardianship of Keffeler
- Washington State Grange v. Washington Republican Party & Washington v. Washington Republican Party (consolidated)
- Watson v. United States
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber Co., Inc.
- Whitfield v. United States & and Hall v. United States (consolidated)
- Whitman v. American Trucking Associations [edited opinion]
- Whitman v. Department of Transportation
- Whorton v. Bockting [commentary]
- Wiggins v. Corcoran
- Wilkie v. Robbins
- Wilkinson v. Austin
- Wilkinson v. Dotson
- Will v. Hallock
- Winkelman v. Parma City School District [commentary] [edited opinion]
- Wisonsin Right to Life, Inc. v. Federal Election Commission
- Woodford v. Garceau
- Woodford v. Ngo
- Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Michigan
- Zedner v. United States
- Zelman v. Simmons-Harris [edited opinion]
- Zuni Public School District v. U.S. Department of Education