Program in Public Law

Case List

• Abdul-Kabir v. Quarterman & Brewer v. Quarterman (consolidated)
• Abdur’rahman v. Bell
• Aetna Health, Inc. v. Davila & Cigna Healthcare of Texas v. Calad (consolidated)
• Alaska v. United States
• Alaska Dep’t of Environmental Conservation v. E.P.A.
• Ali v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
• American Insurance Assn. v. Garamendi [commentary]
• American Trucking Assns. v. Michigan Public Serv. Commn. & Mid-Con Freight Systems v. Michigan public Serv. Commn. (consolidated)
• Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp.
• Arbaugh v. Y&H Corp.
• Arlington Central School Dist. v. Murphy
• Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States [ edited opinion]
• Archer v. Warner
• Arizona v. Gant
• Arkansas Dept. of Human Servs. v. Ahlborn
• Ashcroft v. ACLU [ edited opinion]
• Ayers v. Belmontes
• Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England
• Baldwin v. Reese
• Ballard et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue & Estate of Kanter v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (consolidated)
• Barnhart v. Peabody Coal Co.
• Barnhart v. Thomas
• Bates v. Dow Agroscience
• Baze v. Rees
• Beard v. Banks
• Beck v. Pace International Union
• Begay v. United States
• Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
• Beneficial National Bank v. Anderson
• Benitez v. Mata & Crawford v. Martinez (consolidated)
• Bell v. Thompson
• Black & Decker Disability Plan v. Nord
• Board of Education of the City of New York v. Tom F.
• Boeing Co. v. United States
• Borden Ranch Partnership v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
• Boulware v. United States
• Boumediene v. Bush & Al Odah v. United States (consolidated)
• Bowles v. Russell
• BP America Production Co. v. Burton
• Bradshaw v. Stumpf
• Branch v. Smith
• Brendlin v. California
• Breuer v. Jim’s Concrete of Brevard
• Bridge v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity
• Brigham City v. Stuart
• Brown v. Legal Foundation of Washington
• Brown v. Payton
• Brown v. Sanders
• Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna
• Burgess v. United States
• Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railroad v. White [commentary]
• Burton v. Stewart [commentary]
• California Franchise Tax Board v. Hyatt
• Carey v. Musladin [commentary]
• Castle Rock, Colorado v. Gonzales [ edited opinion]
• CBOCs West, Inc. v. Humphries
• Central Laborers' Pension v. Heinz
• Central Virginia Comm. College v. Katz
• Chamber of Commerce v. Brown
• Chavez v. Martinez
• Cheney v. United States District Court [ commentary] [ edited opinion]
• Cherokee Nation of Okla. v. Thompson & Thompson v. Cherokee Nation of Okla. (consolidated)
• City of Cuyahoga Falls v. Buckeye Community Hope
• City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. Abrams
• City of Sherrill, NY v. Oneida Indian Nation
• Clackamas Gastroenterology v. Wells
• Claiborne v. United States
• Clark v. Arizona
• Clark v. Martinez & Benitez v. Rozos (consolidated)
• Clay v. United States
• Clingman v. Beaver
• Cohen v. California [edited opinion]
• Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Banks & Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Banaitis (consolidated)
• Connecticut Dept. of Public Safety v. Doe
• Cook County v. Chandler
• Cooper Industries v. Aviall Services
• Crawford v. Marion City Election Board & Indiana Democratic Party v. Rokita (consolidated)
• Credit Suisse First Boston Ltd. v. Billing
• CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Georgia State Board of Equalization
• Cuellar v. United States
• Cunningham v. California [commentary]
• Cutter v. Wilkinson [ edited opinion]
• Dada v. Mukasey
• DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno & Wilkins v. Cuno (consolidated)
• Danforth v. Minnesota
• Dastar Corporation v. Twentieth Century Fox Film
• Davenport v. Washington Education Assoc. & Washington v. Washington Education Assoc. (consolidated)
• Davis v. Federal Election Commission
• Davis v. Washington
• Day v. McDonough
• Dead Sea Bromine Co. v. Patrickson
• Deck v. Missouri
• Demore v. Kim
• Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. Davis
• Department of Transportation v. Public Citizen [ edited opinion]
• Department of Treasury v. Chicago
• Desert Palace v. Costa
• Devenpeck v. Alford
• District of Columbia v. Heller
• Dixon v. United States
• Dodd v. United States
• Dolan v. United States
• Dole Food Co. v. Patrickson
• Domino's Pizza v. McDonald
• Dow Chemical Company v. Stephenson
• Dura Phamaceuticals v. Broudo [commentary]
• eBay v. MercExchange
• EC Term of Years Trust v. United States
• Eldred v. Ashcroft
• Empire Healthcare Assurance v. McVeigh
• Engine Manufacturers Assn v. South Coast Air Quality Management District [commentary] [edited opinion]
• Engquist v. Oregon Dept. of Agriculture
• Entergy Louisiana, Inc. v. Louisiana Public Serv. Comm.
• Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corp.
• Evans v. Chavis
• Ewing v. California
• Exxon Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc. & Ortega v. Star-Kist Foods, Inc. (consolidated)[commentary]
• Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.
• F.Hoffman-La Roche v. Empagran [ commentary]
• FCC v. NextWave Personal Communications
• FEC v. Beaumont
• Federal Election Commision v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. & McCain v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. (consolidated)
• Federal Express Corp. v. Holowecki
• Fellers v. United States
• Fernandez-Vargas v. Gonzales
• Fitzgerald v. Racing Assoc. of Central Iowa
• Florida v. Nixon
• Florida Department of Revenue v. Piccadilly Cafeterias
• Ford Motor Co. v. McCauley
• Frew v. Hawkins
• Fry v. Pliler
• Gall v. United States
• General Dynamic Land Systems v. Cline
• Georgia v. Ashcroft
• Garcetti v. Ceballos [commentary] [edited opinion]
• Georgia v. Randolph [commentary] [edited opinion]
• Giles v. California
• Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v. Metrophones Telecommunications, Inc.
• Gomez-Perez v. Potter [edited opinion]
• Gonzales v. Carhart
• Gonzales v. Duenas-Alvarez
• Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita
• Gonzales v. Oregon [ edited opinion]
• Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood
• Gonzales v. Raich [ edited opinion]
• Gonzalez v. Crosby
• Gonzalez v. United States
• Grable & Sons Metal Products v. Darue Engineering
• Graham County Water District v. United States
• Granholm v. Heald, Michigan Beer & Wine Wholesalers Ass'n v. Heald, & Swedenburg v. Kelly (consolidated) [ commentary] [edited opinion]
• Gratz v. Bollinger [commentary] [edited opinion]
• Greenlaw v. United States
• Green Tree Financial Corp. v. Bazzle
• Grutter v. Bollinger [commentary] [edited opinion]
• Halbert v. Michigan
• Hall Street Associates LLC v. Mattel, Inc.
• Hamdan v. Rumsfeld [edited opinion]
• Hamdi v. Rumsfeld [ commentary] [ edited opinion]
• Hammon v. Indiana
• Hans v. Louisiana [edited opinion]
• Hartman v. Moore
• Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation
• Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court [ commentary] [ edited opinion]
• Hill v. McDonough
• Hillside Dairy v. Lyons & Ponderosa Dairy v. Lyons, Jr.
• Hinck v. United States
• Holmes v. South Carolina
• House v. Bell
• Howard Delivery Serv. v. Zurich American Ins. Co.
• Howell v. Mississippi
• Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
• Hudson v. Michigan
• IBP v. Alvarez & Tum v. Barber Foods (consolidated)
• Illinois v. Caballes
• Illinois v. Lidster
• Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc
• Indiana v. Edwards
• Inyo County v. Paiute-Shoshone Indians
• Irizarry v. United States
• Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education
• Jama v. Immingration & Customs Enforcement
• James v. United States
• Jinks v. Richland County
• Johanns v. Livestock Marketing Ass’n & Nebraska Cattlemen, Inc. v. Livestock Marketing Ass’n (consolidated)
• John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States
• Johnson (Jay Shawn) v. California (2003 term)
• Johnson (Jay Shawn) v. California (2004 term)
• Johnson (Garrison S.) v. California (2004 term)
• Johnson v. United States
• Jones v. Bock & Williams v. Overton (consolidated) [commentary]
• Jones v. Flowers
• Kansas v. Colorado
• Kansas v. Marsh
• Kelo v. City of New London [commentary] [ edited opinion]
• Kennedy v. Louisiana
• Kentucky Assn. of Health Plans v. Miller
• Kentucky Retirement Systems v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
• Kimbrough v. United States
• Kircher v. Putnam Funds Trust
• Knight v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
• Kodak v. Image Technical Services [edited opnion]
• Koons Buick v. Nigh
• Kowalski v. Tesmer
• KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. Lasting Impression I, Inc.
• KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.
• Laboratory Corp. of America v. Metabolite Laborities, Inc.
• Lamie v. U.S.Trustee
• LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg & Associates Inc.
• Lawrence v. Florida [commentary]
• Lawrence v. Texas [commentary] [edited opinion]
• Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc.
• Leegin Creative Leather Products v. PSKS, Inc.
• Leocal v. Ashcroft
• Limtiaco v. Camacho
• Lincoln Property Co. v. Roche
• Lingle v. Chevron U.S.A.
• Locke v. Davey [commentary] [edited opinion]
• Lockhart v. United States
• Lockyer v. Andrade
• Logan v. United States
• Long Island Care at Home v. Coke
• Lopez v. Gonzalez & Toledo v. United States (consolidated) [commentary]
• Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife [edited opinion]
• Madigan v. Telemarketing Associates
• Major League Baseball Players Association v. Steve Garvey [edited opinion]
• Marbury v. Madison [edited opinion]
• Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Massachusetts
• Marshall v. Marshall
• Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.
• Maryland v. Pringle
• Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency
• Massaro v. United States
• Mayle v. Felix [commentary] [edited opinion]
• McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n (the BCRA cases)
• McCreary County, KY v. ACLU [ commentary] [ edited opinion]
• Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Lab
• Medellin v. Dretke
• Medellin v. Texas [edited opinion]
• Medical Board v. Hason
• MedImmune v. Genentech [commentary]
• Meadwestvaco Corp. v. Illinois Dept. of Revenue
• Merck KGaA v. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd. [commentary] [edited opinion]
• Merrill Lynch v. Dabit
• Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Glenn
• Meyer v. Holley
• MGM Studios v. Grokster [ commentary] [ edited opinion]
• Microsoft Corp. v. AT&T Corp.
• Miller-El v. Cockrell
• Miller-El v. Dretke [ edited opinion]
• Missouri v. Seibert [ edited opinion]
• Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Williams
• Morgan Stanley Capital Group v. Public Utility Dist. 1 & Calpine Energy Services v. Public Utility Dist. 1 (consolidated)
• Morse v. Frederick [edited opinion]
• Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc.
• Muehler v. Mena
• Munaf v. Geren & Geren v. Omar (consolidated)
• National Association of Home Builders v. Defenders of Wildlife & Environmental Protection Agency v. Defenders of Wildlife (consolidated)
• National Cable & Telecom. Ass'n v. Brand X Internet Servs. & Federal Communications Commission v. Brand X Internet Servs.
• National Park Hospitality Assn. v. Department of Interior
• Nevada Dept. of Human Resources v. Hibbs
• New Jersey v. Delaware
• New York Board of Elections v. Torres
• Nguyen v. United States & Phan v. United States
• Nike, Inc. vs. Kasky
• Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Ayers
• Norfolk Southern Railway v. Kirby
• Norfolk Southern Railway v. Sorrell
• Northern Insurance Co. of New York v. Chatham County, Georgia
• Office of Independent Counsel v. Favish
• Office of Senator Mark Dayton v. Hanson
• Oregon v. Guzek
• Orff v. United States
• Osborn v. Haley
• Overton v. Bazzetta
• Pace v. DiGuglielmo
• Pacificare Health Systems v. Book
• Panetti v. Quarterman
• Parents Involved v. Seattle School District & Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education (consolidated)
• Pasquantino v. United States
• Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders
• Permanent Mission of India v. City of New York
• Pharmaceutical Research & Mfrs. of America v. Walsh
• Philippines v. Pimentel
• Philip Morris USA v. Williams [commentary]
• Pierce County v. Guillen
• Plains Commerce Bank v. Long Family Land & Cattle, Inc.
• Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. v. Gonzales [commentary]
• Powerex Corp. v. Reliant Energy Servs.
• Preston v. Ferrer
• Price v. Vincent
• Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc.
• Randall v. Sorrell, Vermont Republican State Comm. v. Sorrell, and Sorrell v. Randall (consolidated)[edited opinion]
• Rapanos v. United States & Carabell v. Army Corps of Engineers (consolidated)
• Rasul v. Bush & Al Odah v. United States [ commentary] [edited opinion]
• Riegel v. Medtronic Inc.
• Rhines v. Weber
• Rice v. Collins
• Richlin Security Service v. Chertoff
• Riley v. Kennedy
• Rita v. United States
• Rockwell International v. United States ex re. Stone
• Roell v. Withrow
• Rompilla v. Beard
• Roper v. Simmons
• Roper v. Weaver
• Rothgery v. Gillespie County
• Rowe v. New Hampshire Motor Transport Ass'n
• Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights [commentary] [ edited opinion]
• Rumsfeld v. Padilla [ commentary] [ edited opinion]
• Safeco Insurance Co. v. Burr & Geico General Insurance Co. v. Edo (consolidated) [commentary]
• Samson v. California
• Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon & Bustillo v. Johnson (consolidated)
• San Remo Hotel v. San Francisco
• Sattazahn v. Pennsylvania
• Scarborough v. Principi
• Schaffer v. Weast
• Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, Inc. (2002 term)
• Scheidler v. NOW & Operation Rescue v. NOW (consolidated) (2005 term)
• Schriro v. Landrigan
• Schiro v. Summerlin
• Scott v. Harris [commentary]
• Sell v. United States [commentary] [edited opinion]
• Sereboff v. MidAtlantic Medical Services
• S.D. Warren Co. v. Maine Department of Environmental Protection
• Shepard v. United States
• Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia Int’l Shipping
• Slaughter-house Cases [edited opinion]
• Small v. United States
• Smith v. Doe
• Smith v. Jackson, Mississippi [commentary] [edited opinion]
• Smith v. Massachusetts
• Smith v. Texas
• Snyder v. Louisiana
• Sole v. Wyner
• Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Norton
• Spector v. Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd.
• Sprietsma v. Mercury Marine
• Sprint Communications v. APCC Services
• Sprint/United Management Co. v. Mendelsohn
• State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Campbell
• Stewart v. Dutra Construction Co.
• Stogner v. California
• Stoneridge Investment v. Scientific Atlanta
• Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. Henson
• Taylor v. Sturgell
• Tellabs v. Makor Issues & Rights
• Tenet v. Doe
• Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assoc. v. Brentwood
• Texaco, Inc. v. Daugher & Shell Oil Co. v. Daugher (consolidated)
• Texas Redistricting Cases: League of United Latin America Citizens v. Perry, Travis County Texas v. Perry, Jackson v. Perry, GI Forum of Texas v. Perry (consolidated)
• Tory v. Cochran
• Travelers Casualty v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
• United Haulers Assoc. v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Mgmt. Authority 1 [commentary]
• United States v. American Library Association [commentary] [edited opinion]
• United States v. Alvarez-Machain & Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain
• United States v. Atlantic Research Corp.
• United States v. Banks
• United States v. Bean
• United States v. Benitez
• United States v. Booker & United States v. Fanfan (consolidated) [ commentary]
• United States v. Clintwood Elkhorn Mining
• United States v. Georgia & Goodman v. Georgia (consolidated)
• United States v. Gonzales-Lopez
• United States v. Grubbs
• United States v. Navajo Nation
• United States v. Olson
• United States v. Patane [ edited opinion]
• United States v. Recio
• United States v. Resendiz-Ponce
• United States v. Ressam
• United States v. Rodriquez
• United States v. Santos
• United States v. White Mountain Apache Tribe
• United States v. Williams
• United States Department of Transportation v. Public Citizen
• United States Postal Service v. Flamingo Industries
• Unitherm Food Sys. v. Swift-Eckrich
• Uttecht v. Brown
• Van Orden v. Perry [ commentary] [ edited opinion]
• Virginia v. Black
• Virginia v. Hicks [edited opinion]
• Virginia v. Moore
• Volvo Trucks North America v. Reeder-Simco GMC
• Wachovia Bank v. Schmidt
• Wagnon v. Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation
• Wallace v. Chicago
• Watson v. Philip Morris Co.
• Watters v. Wachovia Bank
• Washington v. Recuenco
• Washington State Dept. of Soc. & Health Servs. v. Guardianship of Keffeler
• Washington State Grange v. Washington Republican Party & Washington v. Washington Republican Party (consolidated)
• Watson v. United States
• Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber Co., Inc.
• Whitfield v. United States & and Hall v. United States (consolidated)
• Whitman v. American Trucking Associations [edited opinion]
• Whitman v. Department of Transportation
• Whorton v. Bockting [commentary]
• Wiggins v. Corcoran
• Wilkie v. Robbins
• Wilkinson v. Austin
• Wilkinson v. Dotson
• Will v. Hallock
• Winkelman v. Parma City School District [commentary] [edited opinion]
• Wisonsin Right to Life, Inc. v. Federal Election Commission
• Woodford v. Garceau
• Woodford v. Ngo
• Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Michigan
• Zedner v. United States
• Zelman v. Simmons-Harris [edited opinion]
• Zuni Public School District v. U.S. Department of Education