Duke Law School

Civil Liberties Online

GENERAL

  • ACLU Responds to Senate Passage of Anti-Terrorism Bill, Ashcroft Speech; Promises to Monitor Implementation of Sweeping New Powers (ACLU/National Security: General), Oct. 25, 2001, available at http://www.aclu.org/NationalSecurity/NationalSecurity.cfm?ID=9804&c=24.
  • American Civil Liberties Union (website on various civil liberties and national securities issues), available at http://www.aclu.org/.
  • American Library Association, Washington Office, Issues: Civil Liberties, Intellectual Freedom and Privacy: The USA PATRIOT Act & Libraries (commentary on USA PATRIOT Act of 2001), available at http://www.ala.org/ala/washoff/WOissues/civilliberties/theusapatriotact/usapatriotact.htm.
  • Amitai Etzioni, How Patriotic is the Patriot Act?: Freedom Versus Security in the Age of Terrorism (Routledge 2004).
  • Another Close Call: George Bush and John Kerry Comment on Key Issues in the 2004 Presidential Election Race, 90 A.B.A.J. 50 (2004).
  • Arunabha Bhoumik, Democratic Responses to Terrorism: A Comparative Study of the United States, Israel, and India, 33 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 285 (2005).
  • Be Specific (website on law and technology news), available at http://www.bespacific.com/mt/archives/cat_patriot_act.html.
  • Bill of Rights Defense Committee (analysis of various Bill of Rights issues, including link to USA PATRIOT Act), available at http://www.bordc.org/.
  • C. Raj Kumar, Human Rights Implications of National Security Laws in India: Combating Terrorism while Preserving Civil Liberties, 33 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 195 (2005).
  • Carol Rose and Nancy Murray, It's Patriotic to Question Patriot Act, Bost. Herald, June 9, 2005, at 37.
  • Center for Democracy and Technology, Responses to DOJ Defense of PATRIOT Act, Setting the Record Straight: An Analysis of the Justice Department's PATRIOT Act Website (Oct. 27, 2003), available at http://www.cdt.org/security/usapatriot/031027cdt.shtml.
  • Center for National Security Studies, Civil Liberties: An Agenda for Reform, Patriot Act, available at http://www.cnss.org/.
  • Chris Gagne, Lessons Learned from India's Anti-Terror Act, 25 B.C. Third World L.J. 261 (2005).
  • Christopher Schroeder, Will the Sun Set on the Patriot Act?, Duke Law Magazine, 2005.
  • Coalition for Civil Rights and Democratic Liberties, (opportunity for Americans to access this site and voice their concerns over governmental actions), available at http://www.cradl.info/.
  • Congressional Research Service of the Library of Congress, Charles Doyle, The U.S.A. Patriot Act: A Legal Analysis (April 15, 2002), available at http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/usapatriot/RL31377.pdf.
  • Congressional Research Service of the Library of Congress, Charles Doyle, USA Patriot Act Sunset: Provisions That Expire December 31, 2005 (Jan. 2, 2004), available at http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/usapatriot/RL32186.pdf.
  • Congressional Research Service of the Library of Congress, Marcia S. Smith, Jeffrey W. Seifert, Glenn J. McLoughlin, & John Dimitri Moteff, The Internet and the USA PATRIOT Act: Potential Implications for Electronic Privacy, Security, Commerce, and Government (updated Mar. 4, 2002), available at http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/usapatriot/RL31289.pdf.
  • Congressional Research Service of the Library of Congress, Gina Stevens & Charles Doyle, Privacy: An Overview of Federal Statutes Governing Wiretapping and Electronic Eavesdropping (updated Jan. 13, 2003), available at http://www.epic.org/privacy/wiretap/98-326.pdf.
  • Criminal Terrorism Investigations and Prosecutions: Hearing before the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, 108th Cong. (2003) (statement of Sen. Russ Feingold, Democrat, Wisconsin).
  • Dahlia Lithwick and Julia Tuner, A Guide to the Patriot Act, Part I, Slate Magazine, Sept. 8, 2003, available at http://slate.msn.com/id/2087984.
  • Department of Justice, Preserving Life and Liberty (website devoted to news and information related to the USA PATRIOT Act), available at http://www.lifeandliberty.gov/.
  • Electronic Privacy Information Center, EPIC USA PATRIOT Act Page, available at http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/usapatriot/.
  • Electronic Privacy Information Center, Field Guidance on New Authorities (Redacted) Enacted in the 2001 Anti-Terrorism Legislation, available at http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/DOJ_guidance.pdf.
  • Electronic Privacy Information Center, Report From the Field: The USA PATRIOT Act at Work (July 2004) (report from the Department of Justice), available at http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/usapatriot/doj_report.pdf.
  • Electronic Privacy Information Center, USA PATRIOT Act: Sunsets Report (Apr. 2005) (report from the Department of Justice), available at http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/usapatriot/Sunsets_Report_Final.pdf.
  • Erwin Chemerinsky, Losing Liberties, Applying a Foreign Intelligence Model to Domestic Law Enforcement, 51 UCLA L. Rev. 1619 (2004).
  • Erwin Chemerinsky, Code Red, White & Blue: Litigation Alerts in the USA Patriot Act, California Lawyer, Apr. 2003.
  • Federation of American Scientists, Department of Justice, Attorney General's Guidelines for Information Sharing (Jan. 23, 2002), available at http://www.fas.org/irp/agency/doj/fs092302.html.
  • Federation of American Scientists, FBI Oversight: Terrorism and Other Topics (May 20, 2004) (hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee), available at http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2004_hr/052004transcript.pdf.
  • First Amendment Center, PATRIOT Act: Overview (synopsis by David L. Hudson, Jr., First Amendment Center research attorney), available at http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/Speech/libraries/topic.aspx?topic=patriot_act.
  • Howard Ball, The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001: Balancing Civil Liberties and National Security (Contemporary World Issues Series ed., ABC CLIO, 2004).
  • Investigative Reporters and Editors, Inc, Security vs. Open Records, available at http://www.ire.org/related/records.html.
  • James Thuo Gathii, Torture, Extraterritoriality, Terrorism, and International Law, 67 Alb. L. Rev. 335 (2003).
  • Jeremie J. Wattellier, Comparative Legal Responses to Terrorism: Lessons from Europe, 27 Hastings Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 397 (2004).
  • John Podesta, Bush's Secret Government, The American Prospect, Sept. 2003, available at http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewPrint&articleId=6847.
  • Jonathan Grebinar, Responding to Terrorism: How Must a Democracy Do IT? A Comparison of Israeli and American Law, 31 Fordham Urb. L.J. 261 (2003).
  • Joyce W. Luk, Identifying Terrorists: Privacy Rights in the United States and United Kingdom, 25 Hastings Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 223 (2002).
  • Kent Roach & Gary Trotter, Miscarriages of Justice in the War Against Terror, 109 Penn St. L. Rev. 967 (2005).
  • Kim Lane Scheppele, Other People's PATRIOT Acts: Europe's Response to September 11, 50 Loy. L. Rev. 89 (2004).
  • Lawyers Committee for Human Rights, Assessing the New Normal: Liberty and Security for the Post-September 11 United States (2003), available at http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/pubs/descriptions/Assessing/AssessingtheNewNormal.pdf.
  • Michael P. O'Connor & Celia M. Rumann, Into the Fire: How to Avoid Getting Burned by the Same Mistakes Made Fighting Terrorism in Northern Ireland, 24 Cardozo L. Rev. 1657 (2003).
  • Nadine Strossen, Maintaining Human Rights in a Time of Terrorism: A Case Study in the Value of Legal Scholarship in Shaping Law and Public Policy, 22 N.Y.L. Sch. J. Int'l & Comp. L.  3 (2003).
  • Nancy Chang, The USA PATRIOT Act: What's so Patriotic about Trampling on the Bill of Rights?, at http://www.ccr-ny.org/v2/reports/docs/USA_PATRIOT_ACT.pdf.
  • National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States, The 9/11 Commission Report (July 22, 2004), at http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report.pdf.
  • New York State Bar Association, State Bar News, Merits and Pitfalls of PATRIOT Act Examined by Experts at Summit (March/April 2004) (article by Cailin Brown), available at http://www.nysba.org/Content/ContentGroups/State_Bar_News1/2004_issues/March_April_2004/The_Presidential_Summit.htm.
  • Patricia Mell, Big Brother at the Door: Balancing National Security with Privacy Under the USA PATRIOT Act, 80 Denv. U. L. Rev. 375 (2002).
  • Patriot Act Reauthorization Before the House Select Comm., 109th Cong. 20 (2005).
  • Patriotwatch, (compilation of national security information and news), available at http://www.patriotwatch.org/.
  • Philip A. Thomas, Emergency and Anti-Terrorist Power: 9:11: USA and UK, 26 Fordham Int'l L.J. 1193 (2003).
  • Reauthorization of the USA PATRIOT Act Before the House Judiciary Comm., 109th Cong. (2005) (statement of Sen. Daniel Lungren, Republican, California).
  • Reauthorization of the USA PATRIOT Act Before the House Judiciary Comm., 109th Cong. (2005) (statement of Sen. John Conyers, Jr., Democrat, Michigan).
  • The Reports Committee for Freedom of the Press, Behind the Homefront (daily chronicle of news pertaining to military operations and homeland security), available at http://www.rcfp.org/behindthehomefront/.
  • Rina C.Y. Chung, Hong Kong's "Smart" Identity Card: Data Privacy Issues and Implications for a Post-September 11th America, 4 Asian-Pac. L. & Pol'y J. 442 (2003).
  • Robert Chesney, Civil Liberties and the Terrorism Prevention Paradigm: The Guilt by Association Critique Terrorism and the Constitution: Sacrificing Civil Liberties in the Name of National Security, 101 Mich. L. Rev. 1408 (2003).
  • Stacie Gorman, In the Wake of Tragedy: The Citizens Cry out for War, but can the United States Legally Declare War on Terrorism?, 21 Penn St. Int'l L. Rev.  669 (2003).
  • The Standing Committee on Law and National Security, Patriot Debates: Experts Debate the USA PATRIOT Act (Stewart A. Baker & John Kavanagh ed., American Bar Association 2005).
  • U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy Holds Hearing on the USA PATRIOT Act: Hearing Before the Senate Judiciary Committee, 107th Cong. (2002).

CATEGORY 0: Supreme Court Case Law on the Court's General Approach to the Protection of Civil Liberties During Times of War

  • Jerome A. Barron, Citizenship Matters: The Enemy Combatant Cases, 19 Notre Dame J. L. Ethics & Pub Pol'y 33 (2005) (focusing on recent Supreme Court decisions in which civil liberties have been examined during times of war).
  • Lee Epstein, Daniel E. Ho, Gary King & Jeffrey A. Segal, The Supreme Court during Crisis: How War Affects Only Non-War Cases, 80 N.Y.U.L. Rev. 1 (2005).
  • Lauren Gilbert, When Democracy Dies Behind Closed Doors: The First Amendment and "Special" Interest Hearings, 55 Rutgers L. Rev. 741 (2003).
  • William H. Rehnquist, All the Laws But One (First Vintage Books Edition 2000) (1998).

CATEGORY 1: The Scope of the Government's Surveillance Power

  • American Library Association, Washington Office, Issues: Civil Liberties, Intellectual Freedom and Privacy: The USA PATRIOT Act & Libraries (commentary on USA PATRIOT Act of 2001), available at http://www.ala.org/ala/washoff/WOissues/civilliberties/theusapatriotact/usapatriotact.htm.
  • Amitai Etzioni, How Patriotic is the Patriot Act?: Freedom Versus Security in the Age of Terrorism (Routledge 2004).
  • Anthony E. Orr, Marking Carnivore's Territory: Rethinking Pen Registers on the Internet, 8 Mich. Telecomm. & Tech. L. Rev. 219 (2001/2002).
  • Arthur J. Carter, IV and Audrey Perry, Computer Crimes, 41 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 313, 352-3 (2003) .
  • Campaign for Reader Privacy, Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act, available at http://www.readerprivacy.org/info.jsp.
  • Center for Democracy & Technology, Articles and Reports on the Various Changes to Governmental Monitoring of Internet Information, available at http://www.cdt.org/.
  • Christopher Schroeder, Will the Sun Set on the Patriot Act?, Duke Law Magazine, 2005, at 27.
  • Department of Justice, Responses from the Department of Justice to Questions on the USA PATRIOT Act posed by Hon. Scott (July 5, 2005), available at http://judiciary.house.gov/media/pdfs/ScottDOJ2.pdf.
  • Electronic Frontier Foundation, Defending Freedom in the Digital World (website dedicated to analysis of internet communication protection), available at http://www.eff.org/.
  • Jason Krause, Cyber-Libertarians: A Legal Group Formed to Defend Civil Liberties on the Web Gears Up to Fight the USA Patriot Act, 89 A.B.A.J. 50 (2003).
  • John W. Whitehead & Steven H. Aden, Forfeiting "Enduring Freedom" for "Homeland Security": A Constitutional Analysis of the USA PATRIOT Act and the Justice Department's Anti-Terrorism Initiatives, 51 Am. U. L. Rev. 1081 (2002).
  • Katherine K. Coolidge, "Baseless Hysteria": The Controversy Between the Department of Justice and the American Library Association over the USA PATRIOT Act, 97 Law Libr. J. 7 (2005).
  • Martha Minow, What is the Greatest Evil?: The Lesser Evil: Political Ethics in an Age of Terror by Michael Ignatieff, 118 Harv. L. Rev. 2134 (2005) (book review).
  • Michael J. Woods, Counterintelligence and Access to Transactional Records: A Practical History of USA PATRIOT Act Section 215, 1 J. Nat'l Security L. & Pol'y 37 (2005).
  • Michael Sander, Patriot Act Foes Draw Doctors To Their Cause, CQ Weekly, Sept. 19, 2005, at 2473.
  • Nathan C. Henderson, The PATRIOT Act's Impact on the Government's Ability to Conduct Electronic Surveillance of Ongoing Domestic Communications, 52 Duke L.J. 179 (2002).
  • Open the Government Organization, (information database dedicated to unveiling information pertaining to government actions), available at http://openthegovernment.org/.
  • Orin S. Kerr, Internet Surveillance Law after the USA PATRIOT Act: The Big Brother that Isn't, 97 Nw. U. L. Rev. 607 (2003).
  • PATRIOT Act Reauthorization Before the Comm. on House Select Intelligence, 109th Cong. (2005) (statement of James B. Comey, Deputy Attorney Gen., United States Dep't. of Justice).
  • Peter G. Madrinan, Devil in the Details: Constitutional Problems Inherent in the Internet Surveillance Provisions of the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, 64 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 783 (2003).
  • R.J. Cinquegrana and Richard M. Harper II, The USA PATRIOT Act: Affects on American Employers and Businesses, 46 B.B.J. 10 (2002) (highlighting sections 209, 210, 212 of the Act as examples of increased government access to information held by employers and businesses).
  • Robert Ditzion, Electronic Surveillance in the Internet Age: The Strange Case of Pen Registers, 41 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 1321 (2004).
  • Using Open-source Information Effectively Before the House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Intelligence, Information Sharing, and Terrorism Risk Assessment, 109th Cong. (statement of Joseph Onek, Senior Policy Analyst of the Open Society Institute).
  • Vijay Sekhon, The Civil Rights of "Others": Antiterrorism, The Patriot Act, and Arab and South Asian American Rights in Post-9/11 American Society, 8 Tex. F. on C.L. & C.R. 117 (2003).

CATEGORY 2: The Scope of the Government's Prosecutorial Tools against Terrorism

  • John Lichtenthal, The PATRIOT Act and Bush's Military Tribunals: Effective Enforcement or Attacks on Civil Liberties?, 10 Buff. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 399 (2004) (focusing on section 802's effects on anti-terrorist prosecution).
  • Jose R. Almonte, For the Sake of National Security: The Scope of the United States Attorney General's Authority in Light of 8 C.F.R. 236.6, 56 Rutgers L. Rev. 817 (2004).
  • Natsu Taylor Saito, Civil Liberties Post-September 11: For "Our" Security: Who is an "American" and What is Protected by Enhanced Law Enforcement and Intelligence Powers?, 2 Seattle J. Soc. Just. 23 (2003/2004) (using section 812 as an example of the government's broadened authority with the justification that those involved in terrorism have unchangeable, dangerous convictions in their causes).
  • Nicholas Berg & Christopher Kelly, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations, 41 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 1027 (2004).
  • Nicholas J. Perry, The Numerous Federal Legal Definitions of Terrorism: The Problem of Too Many Grails, 30 J. Legis. 249 (2004).
  • Patricia Mell, Big Brother at the Door: Balancing National Security with Privacy Under the USA PATRIOT Act, 80 Denv. U. L. Rev. 375 (2002).
  • Paul Rosenzweig, Civil Liberty and the Response to Terrorism, 42 Duq. L. Rev. 663 (2004) (highlighting that the increased penalties under section 810 may further complicate infringement on civil liberties).
  • Rita Marie Cain, Nonprofit Solicitation under the Telemarketing Sales Rule, 57 Fed. Comm. L.J. 81 (2004) (examining the PATRIOT Act's effects on telemarketing organizations, especially under the auspice of section 1011).
  • R.J. Cinquegrana and Richard M. Harper II, The USA PATRIOT Act: Affects on American Employers and Businesses, 46 B.B.J. 10 (2002).
  • Ryan P. Wallace, Adam M. Lusthaus & John Hwan (Justin) Kim, Twentieth Survey of White Collar Crime: Computer Crimes, 42 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 223 (2005).

CATEGORY 3: The Government's Institutional Capacity to Address Terrorist Activity.

  • Amitai Etzioni, How Patriotic is the Patriot Act?: Freedom Versus Security in the Age of Terrorism (Routledge 2004).
  • Bethany Kohl Hipp, Defending Expanded Presidential Authority to Regulate Foreign Assets and Transactions, 17 Emory Int'l L. Rev. 1311 (2003).
  • Charles A. Flint, Challenging the Legality of Section 106 of the USA PATRIOT Act, 67 Alb. L. Rev. 1183 (2004).
  • Christopher Schroeder, Will the Sun Set on the Patriot Act?, Duke Law Magazine, 2005, at 27.
  • Claire S. Hulse, Dangerous Balance: The Ninth Circuit's Validation of Expansive DNA Testing of Federal Parolees, 35 Golden Gate U.L. Rev. 31 (2005).
  • Congressional Research Service of the Library of Congress, Charles Doyle, USA Patriot Act Sunset: Provisions That Expire December 31, 2005 (Jan. 2, 2004), available at http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/usapatriot/RL32186.pdf.
  • Emanuel Gross, The Influence of Terrorist Attacks on Human Rights in the United States: The Aftermath of September 11, 2001, 28 N.C.J. Int'l L. & Com. Reg. 1 (2002).
  • Erwin Chemerinsky, Losing Liberties, Applying a Foreign Intelligence Model to Domestic Law Enforcement, 51 UCLA L. Rev. 1619 (2004).
  • Grayson A. Hoffman, Litigating Terrorism: The New FISA Regime, the Wall, and the Fourth Amendment, 40 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 1655 (2003).
  • Heath H. Galloway, Don't Forget What We're Fighting For: Will the Fourth Amendment Be a Casualty of the War on Terror?, 59 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 921 (2002).
  • Joseph G. Poluka, Perspectives on the USA PATRIOT Act: the PATRIOT Act: Indispensable Tool Against Terror, 76 PA Bar Assn. Quarterly 33 (2005).
  • Keith Sealing, "State sponsors of terrorism" is a question, not an answer: the terrorism amendment to the FSIA makes less sense now than it did before 9/11, 38 Texas Int'l L.J. 119 (2003).
  • Michael P. O'Connor & Celia Rumann, Emergency and Anti-Terrorist Power: Going, Going, Gone: Sealing the Fate of the Fourth Amendment, 26 Fordham Int'l L.J. 1234 (2003).
  • Nora Graham, Patriot Act II and Denationalization: An Unconstitutional Attempt to Revive Stripping Americans of their Citizenship, 52 Clev. St. L. Rev. 593 (2004/2005) (criticizing section 501 of the Act because of the power it grants to the government).
  • PATRIOT Act Reauthorization Before the Comm. on House Select Intelligence, 109th Cong. (2005) (statement of James B. Comey, Deputy Attorney Gen., United States Dep't. of Justice).
  • PATRIOT Act Reauthorization Before the Comm. on Senate Judiciary, 109th. Cong (2005) (statement of Sen. Patrick Leahy).
  • Peter A. Dumbuya, Terrorist and Hate Groups: A Primer for Lawyers, 64 Ala. L. Rev. 296 (2003) (noting section 101 of the Act as a measure to improve domestic security against terrorism).
  • Richard Henry Seamon & William Dylan Gardner, The PATRIOT Act and the Wall Between Foreign Intelligence and Law Enforcement, 28 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 319 (2005) (arguing that section 218 never destroyed an actual wall between information sharing because the only wall present was a misunderstood interpretation of Congressional intent).
  • Risa Berkower, Sliding Down a Slippery Slope? The Future Use of Administrative Subpoenas in Criminal Investigations, 73 Fordham L. Rev. 2251 (2005).
  • Sara Sun Beale & James E. Felman, Responses to the September 11 Attacks: The Consequences of Enlisting Federal Grand Juries in the War on Terrorism: Assessing the USA Patriot Act's Changes to Grand Jury Secrecy, 25 Harv. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 699 (2002).

CATEGORY 4 : Statutory Safeguards Against the Infringement of Civil Liberties

  • Cynthia R. Ryan, The USA PATRIOT Act Helps Law Enforcement Meet the Anti-Terrorism Challenge, 21 Delaware Lawyer 6 (2003).
  • Joseph G. Poluka, Perspectives on the USA PATRIOT Act: the PATRIOT Act: Indispensable Tool Against Terror, 76 PA Bar Assn. Quarterly 33 (2005).
  • Martha Minow, What is the Greatest Evil?: The Lesser Evil: Political Ethics in an Age of Terror by Michael Ignatieff, 118 Harv. L. Rev. 2134 (2005).
  • Melissa K. Matthews, Restoring the Imperial Presidency: An Examination of President Bush's New Emergency Powers, 23 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol'y 455 (2002).
  • Stephen D. Lobaugh, Congress' Response to September 11: Liberty's Protector, 1 Geo. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 131 (2002).
  • Symposium, The Changing Laws of War: Do We Need a New Legal Regime after September 11?: Sunsetting Judicial Opinions, 79 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1237 (2004).
  • Timothy Edgar & Witold Walczak, Perspectives on the USA PATRIOT Act: We Can be Both Safe and Free: How the PATRIOT Act Threatens Civil Liberties, 76 PA Bar Assn. Quarterly 21 (2005).
  • U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the Inspector General, Report to Congress on Implementation of Section 1001 of the USA PATRIOT Act (Mar. 11, 2005), available at http://www.globalsecurity.org/security/library/report/2005/patriotmay2005.pdf.
  • Vijay Sekhon, The Civil Rights of "Others": Antiterrorism, The Patriot Act, and Arab and South Asian American Rights in Post-9/11 American Society, 8 Tex. F. on C.L. & C.R. 117 (2003).

CATEGORY 5: Requirements Related to Financial Reporting and Financial Institution Cooperation with Law Enforcement

  • American Bankers Association, Issue of Interest: Money Laundering and USA Patriot Act, available at http://www.aba.com/Press+Room/PR_ML_Issue.htm.
  • Amitai Etzioni, How Patriotic is the Patriot Act?: Freedom Versus Security in the Age of Terrorism (Routledge 2004).
  • Christina Jackson, Combating the New Generation of Money Laundering: Regulations and Agencies in the Battle of Compliance, Avoidance, and Prosecution in a Post-September 11 World, 4 J. High Tech. L.J. 139 (2004).
  • Christopher Boran, Money Laundering, 40 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 847 (2003).
  • David R. Sahr & Daniel Morales, U.S. Anti-Money Laundering Legislation, 8 NAFTA L. & Bus. Rev. Am. 583 (2002).
  • Elwood Earl Sanders, Jr., Esq. & George Edward Sanders, Esq., The Effect of the USA PATRIOT Act on the Money Laundering and Currency Transaction Laws, 4 Rich. J. Global L. & Bus. 47 (2004).
  • George A. Lyden , The International Money Laundering Abatement and Anti-Terrorist Financing Act of 2001: Congress Wears a Blindfold while Giving Money Laundering Legislation a Facelift, 8 Fordham J. Corp. & Fin. L. 201 (2003).
  • Howard Ball, The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001: Balancing Civil Liberties and National Security (Contemporary World Issues Series ed., ABC CLIO, 2004).
  • Ilias Bantekas, Current Development: The International Law of Terrorist Financing, 97 Am. J. Int'l L. 315 (2003).
  • Justin Serafini, Money Laundering, 41 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 887 (2004).
  • Michael Gruson, The U.S. Jurisdiction over Transfers of U.S. Dollars between Foreigners and over Ownership of U.S. Dollar Accounts in Foreign Banks, 2004 Colum. Bus. L. Rev. 721 (2004).
  • Rebecca Gregory, The Lawyer's Role: Will Unlce Sam Want You in the Fight Against Money Laundering and Terrorism?, 72 UMKC L. Rev. 23 (2003).
  • Sireesha Chenumolu, Revamping International Securities Laws to Break the Financial Infrastructure of Global Terrorism, 31 Ga. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 385 (2003).
  • Stefan D. Cassella, The Forfeiture of Property Involved in Money Laundering Offenses, 7 Buff. Crim. L. R. 583 (2004).
  • Walter Perkel, Money Laundering and Terrorism: Informal Value Transfer Systems, 41 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 183 (2004).

CATEGORY 6: Immigration and Border Protection.

  • ACLU Counsel Testifies on Immigration Concerns In Anti-Terrorism Legislation (ACLU/Immigrant Rights: General), Oct. 12, 2001, available at http://www.aclu.org/ImmigrantsRights/ImmigrantsRights.cfm?ID=9791&c=22.
  • Amitai Etzioni, How Patriotic is the Patriot Act?: Freedom Versus Security in the Age of Terrorism (Routledge 2004).
  • Arvin Lugay, "In Defense of Internment": Why Some Americans are More "Equal" than Others, 12 Asian L.J. 209 (2005) (book review).
  • Dana Keith, In the Name of National Security or Insecurity?: The Potential Indefinite Detention of Noncitizen, 16 Fla. J. Int'l L. 405 (2004) (focusing on the expanded authority to detain based on section 411 authority).
  • Heather Jacobson, Refugees and Humanitarian Emergencies, 17 Geo. Immigr. L.J. 667 (2003).
  • Howard Hom, The Immigration Landscape in the Aftermath of September 11, 25 Los Angeles Lawyer 23 (2002).
  • Jonathan Grebinar, Responding to Terrorism: How Must a Democracy do it? A Comparison of Israeli and American Law, 31 Fordham Urb. L.J. 261 (2003).
  • Joshua D. Zelman, Anti-Terrorism Legislation Part-Two: The Impact and Consequences, 11 J. Transnat'l L. & Pol'y 421 (2002).
  • Lawrence M. Lebowitz & Ira L. Podheiser, A Summary of the Changes in Immigration Policies and Practices after the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001: The USA PATRIOT Act and Other Measures, 63 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 873 (2002).
  • Leslie A. Holman, Esq., The Impact of September 11th on America's Immigration Laws, Policy, and Procedures, 27 Ver. B. J. & L. Dig. 17 (2001).
  • Lori Adams, Refugee Rights in the U.S. Scaled Back by Recent Anti-Terrorism Legislation : Are we Violating the United Nations Refugee Convention, 19 N.Y.L. Sch. J. Hum. Rts. 807 (2003).
  • Margaret Graham Tebo, The Closing Door: U.S. Policies Leave Immigrants Separate and Unequal, 88 A.B.A.J. 42 (2002).
  • Marie A. Taylor, Immigration Enforcement Post-September 11: Safeguarding the Civil Rights of Middle-Eastern American and Immigrant Communities, 17 Geo. Immigr. L.J. 63 (2002).
  • Regina Germain, Rushing to Judgment: The Unintended Consequences of the USA PATRIOT Act for Bona Fide Refugees, 16 Geo. Immigr. L.J. 505, (2002).
  • Shawne Boyne, The Future of Liberal Democracies in a Time of Terror: A Comparison of the Impact on Civil Liberties in the Federal Republic of Germany and the United States, 11 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int'l L. 111 (2003).
  • Shirin Sinnar, Patriotic or Unconstitutional? The Mandatory Detention of Aliens Under the USA Patriot Act, 55 Stan. L. Rev. 1419 (2003).
  • Tova Indritz, Legislation, 26 Champion 42 (2002).
  • Vijay Sekhon, The Civil Rights of "Others": Antiterrorism, The Patriot Act, and Arab and South Asian American Rights in Post-9/11 American Society, 8 Tex. F. on C.L. & C.R. 117 (2003).

CATEGORY 7: Cases and Laws Outside of the Scope of the Patriot Act but Relevant to Civil Liberties Post 9/11

  • ACLU Joins in FOIA Request for Information on Detainees, Says Government Has Refused to Answer Previous Inquiries (ACLU/Immigrant Rights: Detainees), Oct. 29, 2001, available at http://www.aclu.org/ImmigrantsRights/ImmigrantsRights.cfm?ID=9807&c=95.
  • Beryl A. Howell, Perspectives on the USA PATRIOT Act: Surveillance Powers in the USA PATRIOT Act: How Scary are They?, 76 PA Bar Assn. Quarterly 12 (2005) (emphasizing that certain government actions were not authorized by the PATRIOT Act itself, such as practices toward those detained post-September 11th, but have been linked, perhaps incorrectly, to its line of authority).
  • Cageprisoners (Islamic human rights website dedicated to raising awareness on the individuals involved in and victimized by the war on terror), available at http://www.cageprisoners.com/.
  • The Committee on Federal Courts, The Indefinite Detention of "Enemy Combatants": Balancing Due Process and National Security in the Context of the War on Terror, 59 The Record 41 (2004).
  • David L. Herman, A Dish Best Not Served at All: How Foreign Military War Crimes Suspects Lack Protection under United States and International Law, 172 Mil. L. Rev. 40 (2002).
  • Duke Law, Program in Public Law, Supreme Court Online, available at http://www.law.duke.edu/publiclaw/.
  • Jerome A. Barron, Citizenship Matters: The Enemy Combatant Cases, 19 Notre Dame J. L. Ethics & Pub Pol'y 33 (2005) (focusing on recent Supreme Court decisions in which civil liberties have been examined during times of war).
  • John Lichtenthal, The PATRIOT Act and Bush's Military Tribunals: Effective Enforcement or Attacks on Civil Liberties?, 10 Buff. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 399 (2004).
  • Lawyers Committee for Human Rights, Assessing the New Normal: Liberty and Security for the Post-September 11 United States (2003), at http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/pubs/descriptions/Assessing/AssessingtheNewNormal.pdf.
  • Lauren Gilbert, When Democracy Dies Behind Closed Doors: The First Amendment and "Special" Interest Hearings, 55 Rutgers L. Rev. 741 (2003).
  • Madeline Morris, Terrorism: The Politics of Prosecution, 5 Chi. J. Int'l L. 405 (2005).
  • National Institute for Military Justice, (internet source for military commissions news and other national security issues), available at http://www.nimj.org/home.asp.
  • Niki Kuckes, The Useful, Dangerous Fiction of Grand Jury Independence, 41 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 1 (2004)
  • New York State Bar Association, Report on Military Commissions (June 12, 2002) (written by John C. Maloney, Chair), at http://www.nysba.org/Content/ContentGroups/News1/Reports3/June02Antiterrorismreport.pdf.
  • New York State Bar Association, Resolution on Military Commissions (June 22, 2002), at http://www.nysba.org/Content/ContentGroups/News1/Reports3/Resolution_on_Military_Commissions_.htm.
  • Prisoner of West Organization, (examination of those detained as a result of the war on terror), available at http://www.prisonerofwest.org/home.htm.
  • The Reports Committee for Freedom of the Press, Behind the Homefront (daily chronicle of news pertaining to military operations and homeland security), available at http://www.rcfp.org/behindthehomefront/.
  • Scott S. Silliman, On Military Commissions, 36 Case W. Res. J. Int'l. L. 529 (2004).
  • Secret Evidence in the War on Terror, 118 Harv. L. Rev. 1962 (2005).