Duke Law School shield Duke Law & Technology Review logo
TOPICS
eCommerce
CyberCrime
International
Media & Comm.
Patents & Tech.
Health & Biotech.
Copyrights & TM.
 
DLTR Home
iBlawg
About DLTR
Contact DLTR
Submissions
Staff
Duke Law
eCommerce:
RECENT ARTICLES:
WHERE WILL CONSUMERS FIND PRIVACY PROTECTION FROM RFIDS?: A CASE FOR FEDERAL LEGISLATION
  2007 Duke L. & Tech. Rev. 0003
eCommerce
3/8/2007
With the birth of RFID technology, businesses gained the ability to tag products with practically invisible computer chips that relay information about consumer behavior to remote databases. Such tagging permits retailers and manufacturers to track the purchases, identities, and movements of their customers. In the absence of enforceable regulations, society risks being subjected to an unprecedented level of Orwellian surveillance. This iBrief addresses consumer privacy concerns stemming from the proliferation of RFID technology. It discusses why tort law, state legislation, FTC guidelines, and proposed regulations are insufficient methods to alleviate consumer privacy concerns and suggests amending various federal privacy laws, thereby prohibiting the underlying RFID tracking behavior.


Archived Articles >>>

Title:

Date Posted
INTERNET SALES TAXES FROM BORDERS TO AMAZON: HOW LONG BEFORE ALL OF YOUR PURCHASES ARE TAXED?2/13/2006
ANTI-EMPLOYER BLOGGING: EMPLOYEE BREACH OF THE DUTY OF LOYALTY AND THE PROCEDURE FOR ALLOWING DISCOVERY OF A BLOGGER'S IDENTITY BEFORE SERVICE OF PROCESS IS EFFECTED1/17/2006
CODDLING SPIES: WHY THE LAW DOESN'T ADEQUATELY ADDRESS COMPUTER SPYWARE11/16/2005
WHEN BIG BROTHER PRIVATIZES: COMMERCIAL SURVEILLANCE, THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974, AND THE FUTURE OF RFID8/31/2005
STOP THE ABUSE OF GMAIL!5/16/2005
CANNING SPAM: CONSUMER PROTECTION OR A LID ON FREE SPEECH?12/21/2004
1984 IS STILL FICTION: ELECTRONIC MONITORING IN THE WORKPLACE AND U.S. PRIVACY LAW12/1/2004
PRIVACY, FREE SPEECH & THE GARDEN GROVE CYBER CAFÉ EXPERIMENT10/15/2004
VIRTUAL SHAREHOLDER MEETINGS9/1/2004
RESTORING A PUBLIC INTEREST VISION OF LAW IN THE AGE OF THE INTERNET6/23/2004
ONLINE DEFAMATION: BRINGING THE COMMUNICATIONS DECENCY ACT OF 1996 IN LINE WITH SOUND PUBLIC POLICY10/6/2003
THE PENDING DETERMINATION OF THE LEGALITY OF INTERNET GAMBLING IN THE UNITED STATES7/11/2003
CAN THE INTERNET KILL? HOLDING WEB INVESTIGATORS LIABLE FOR THEIR CRIMINAL CUSTOMERS5/6/2003
THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT: PROMOTING E-QUALITY OR EXAGGERATING THE DIGITAL DIVIDE?4/15/2003
THE PROS AND CONS OF ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION: AN ASSESSMENT OF CYBER-MEDIATION WEBSITES2/18/2003
MOM & POP V. DOT-COM: A DISPARITY IN TAXATION BASED ON HOW YOU SHOP?12/19/2002
ONLINE BROKERS AND THE SEC: STILL WORKING OUT THE GLITCHES11/6/2002
THE INTERNET OPENS ITS DOORS FOR .BIZ- NESS9/27/2001
ARE DOMAIN NAMES PROPERTY? THE SEX.COM CONTROVERSY9/10/2001
MONITORING EMPLOYEE E-MAIL: EFFICIENT WORKPLACES VS. EMPLOYEE PRIVACY7/25/2001
THE COMPLEXITIES OF ON-LINE MUTUAL FUND ADVERTISING: A SUMMARY OF THE RELEVANT REGULATIONS6/4/2001
SOFTWARE DISCLOSURE AND LIABILITY UNDER THE SECURITIES ACTS5/10/2001
FTC VS. TOYSMART3/26/2001
ARE ONLINE BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS EXECUTED BY ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES LEGALLY BINDING?2/28/2001
Search:
Related Sites: