Duke Law School shield Duke Law & Technology Review logo
TOPICS
eCommerce
eDiscovery
CyberCrime
International
Media & Comm.
Patents & Tech.
Health & Biotech.
Copyrights & TM.
 
DLTR Home
About DLTR
Contact DLTR
Submissions
Staff
Duke Law
Copyrights & Trademarks:
RECENT ARTICLES:
A HYPOTHETICAL NON-INFRINGING NETWORK: AN EXAMINATION OF THE EFFICACY OF SAFE HARBOR IN SECTION 512(C) OF THE DMCA
  2009 Duke L. & Tech. Rev. 009
Copyrights & Trademarks
11/11/2009
This iBrief will present a hypothetical network that allows dissidents to transfer information outside the watchful eye of an oppressive government. It will argue that because a network operator meets the requirements of the safe harbor of section 512(c) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, the hosts of the network are immune from any vicarious copyright liability.


Archived Articles >>>

Title:

 Date Posted
COMMERCIAL SKIPPING TECHNOLOGY AND THE NEW MARKET DYNAMIC: THE RELEVANCE OF ANTITRUST LAW TO AN EMERGING TECHNOLOGY 8/18/2009
CIRCUMVENTING ACCESS CONTROLS UNDER THE DIGITAL MILLENNIUM COPYRIGHT ACT: ANALYZING THE SECUROM DEBATE 6/29/2009
SPORE, DRM, AND PIRATES: UCITA AND MARKET REALITIES 4/16/2009
CIRCUMVENTING AUTHORITY: LOOPHOLES IN THE DMCA’S ACCESS CONTROLS 03/4/09
ON THE PERILS OF INADEQUATE ANALOGIES 4/3/2008
DOMAIN TASTING IS TAKING OVER THE INTERNET AS A RESULT OF ICANN’S "ADD GRACE PERIOD" 12/13//07
THIS TOWN AIN’T BIG ENOUGH FOR THE BOTH OF US--OR IS IT? REFLECTIONS ON COPYRIGHT, THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND GOOGLE’S USE OF OTHERS’ CONTENT 6/11/2007
IS KELLY SHIFTING UNDER GOOGLE'S FEET? NEW NINTH CIRCUIT IMPACT ON THE GOOGLE LIBRARY PROJECT LITIGATION3/8/2007
DOES INFORMATION BEGET INFORMATION?2/7/2007
NEWSGROUPS FLOAT INTO SAFE HARBOR, AND COPYRIGHT HOLDERS ARE SUNK11/13/2006
INJUNCTION JUNCTION: REMEMBERING THE PROPER FUNCTION AND FORM OF EQUITABLE RELIEF IN TRADEMARK LAW5/5/2006
DOWNLOAD, STREAM, OR SOMEWHERE IN BETWEEN: THE POTENTIAL FOR LEGAL MUSIC USE IN PODCASTING4/13/2006
UNFINISHED BUSINESS: ARE TODAY'S P2P NETWORKS LIABLE FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT?10/4/2005
KEYWORD-LINKED ADVERTISING, TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT, AND GOOGLE'S CONTRIBUTORY LIABILITY9/1/2005
GOOGLE LIBRARY: BEYOND FAIR USE? 4/15/2005
TELEVISION: PEER-TO-PEER'S NEXT CHALLENGER3/31/2005
UK'S IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ANTI-CIRCUMVENTION PROVISIONS OF THE EU COPYRIGHT DIRECTIVE: AN ANALYSIS1/22/2004
LIGHTS, CAMERA, LAWSUIT11/26/2003
UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES: STATE MERGER STATUTES AND NONASSIGNABLE LICENSES10/13/2003
STRENGTHENING THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN COPYRIGHT AND TRADEMARK: THE SUPREME COURT TAKES A STAND 9/30/2003
ARE WE LEGISLATING AWAY OUR SCIENTIFIC FUTURE? THE DATABASE DEBATE9/22/2003
STUDENTS, MUSIC AND THE NET: A COMMENT ON PEER-TO-PEER FILE SHARING9/17/2003
ELDRED V. ASHCROFT: HOW ARTISTS AND CREATORS FINALLY GOT THEIR DUE5/19/2003
REALITY BITES: HOW THE BITING REALITY OF PIRACY IN CHINA IS WORKING TO STRENGTHEN ITS COPYRIGHT LAWS2/11/2003
INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDER LIABILITY FOR CONTRIBUTORY TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT AFTER GUCCI12/9/2002
THE EXTRATERRITORIAL REACH OF TRADEMARKS ON THE INTERNET6/4/2002
AN INTERVIEW WITH CASPAR BOWDEN4/30/2002
COURT GIVES THUMBS-UP FOR USE OF THUMBNAIL PICTURES ONLINE4/16/2002
Universal City Studios, Inc. V. Corley : The Constitutional Under Pinnings of Fair Use Remain in Open Question2/14/2002
MUSICNET & PRESSPLAY: TO TRUST OR ANTITRUST?11/12/2001
HACKING DIGITAL VIDEO RECORDERS: POTENTIAL COPYRIGHT LIABILITY FOR DVR HACKERS AND SERVICE PROVIDERS8/17/2001
COPYRIGHTS IN COMPUTER-GENERATED WORKS: WHOM, IF ANYONE, DO WE REWARD?7/11/2001
THE FIRST SALE DOCTRINE AND DIGITAL PHONORECORDS5/31/2001
THE FUTURE OF DATABASE PROTECTION IN U.S. COPYRIGHT LAW5/22/2001
THE FATE OF NAPSTER: DIGITAL DOWNLOADING FACES AN UPHILL BATTLE3/18/2001
CYBERSQUATTING: THE LATEST CHALLENGE IN FEDERAL TRADEMARK PROTECTION2/28/2001
Search:
Related Sites: