Duke Law School shield Duke Law & Technology Review logo
TOPICS
eCommerce
eDiscovery
CyberCrime
International
Media & Comm.
Patents & Tech.
Health & Biotech.
Copyrights & TM.
 
DLTR Home
About DLTR
Contact DLTR
Submissions
Staff
Duke Law
This page has moved. You are being automatically redirected to the new location. If you are not redirected within a few seconds, please find the new page here.
Copyrights & Trademarks:
RECENT ARTICLES:
LENZ V. UNIVERSAL MUSIC CORP. AND THE POTENTIAL EFFECT OF FAIR USE ANALYSIS UNDER THE TAKEDOWN PROCEDURES OF §512 OF THE DMCA
  2009 Duke L. & Tech. Rev. 010
Copyrights & Trademarks
11/25/2009
The notice and takedown/putback procedures in §512 of the Digital Millennium Act fail to adequately protect the rights of individuals who post content on the internet. This iBrief examines the notice and takedown/putback procedures and Judge Fogel's decision in Lenz v. Universal Music Corp., which requires a copyright owner to conduct a fair use evaluation prior to issuing a takedown notice. This iBrief concludes such a requirement is an appropriate first step towards creating adequate protection for user-generated content on the Internet.


Archived Articles >>>

Title:

Date Posted
A HYPOTHETICAL NON-INFRINGING NETWORK: AN EXAMINATION OF THE EFFICACY OF SAFE HARBOR IN SECTION 512(C) OF THE DMCA 11/11/2009
COMMERCIAL SKIPPING TECHNOLOGY AND THE NEW MARKET DYNAMIC: THE RELEVANCE OF ANTITRUST LAW TO AN EMERGING TECHNOLOGY 8/18/2009
CIRCUMVENTING ACCESS CONTROLS UNDER THE DIGITAL MILLENNIUM COPYRIGHT ACT: ANALYZING THE SECUROM DEBATE 6/29/2009
SPORE, DRM, AND PIRATES: UCITA AND MARKET REALITIES 4/16/2009
CIRCUMVENTING AUTHORITY: LOOPHOLES IN THE DMCA’S ACCESS CONTROLS 03/4/09
ON THE PERILS OF INADEQUATE ANALOGIES 4/3/2008
DOMAIN TASTING IS TAKING OVER THE INTERNET AS A RESULT OF ICANN’S "ADD GRACE PERIOD" 12/13//07
THIS TOWN AIN’T BIG ENOUGH FOR THE BOTH OF US--OR IS IT? REFLECTIONS ON COPYRIGHT, THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND GOOGLE’S USE OF OTHERS’ CONTENT 6/11/2007
IS KELLY SHIFTING UNDER GOOGLE'S FEET? NEW NINTH CIRCUIT IMPACT ON THE GOOGLE LIBRARY PROJECT LITIGATION3/8/2007
DOES INFORMATION BEGET INFORMATION?2/7/2007
NEWSGROUPS FLOAT INTO SAFE HARBOR, AND COPYRIGHT HOLDERS ARE SUNK11/13/2006
INJUNCTION JUNCTION: REMEMBERING THE PROPER FUNCTION AND FORM OF EQUITABLE RELIEF IN TRADEMARK LAW5/5/2006
DOWNLOAD, STREAM, OR SOMEWHERE IN BETWEEN: THE POTENTIAL FOR LEGAL MUSIC USE IN PODCASTING4/13/2006
UNFINISHED BUSINESS: ARE TODAY'S P2P NETWORKS LIABLE FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT?10/4/2005
KEYWORD-LINKED ADVERTISING, TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT, AND GOOGLE'S CONTRIBUTORY LIABILITY9/1/2005
GOOGLE LIBRARY: BEYOND FAIR USE? 4/15/2005
TELEVISION: PEER-TO-PEER'S NEXT CHALLENGER3/31/2005
UK'S IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ANTI-CIRCUMVENTION PROVISIONS OF THE EU COPYRIGHT DIRECTIVE: AN ANALYSIS1/22/2004
LIGHTS, CAMERA, LAWSUIT11/26/2003
UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES: STATE MERGER STATUTES AND NONASSIGNABLE LICENSES10/13/2003
STRENGTHENING THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN COPYRIGHT AND TRADEMARK: THE SUPREME COURT TAKES A STAND 9/30/2003
ARE WE LEGISLATING AWAY OUR SCIENTIFIC FUTURE? THE DATABASE DEBATE9/22/2003
STUDENTS, MUSIC AND THE NET: A COMMENT ON PEER-TO-PEER FILE SHARING9/17/2003
ELDRED V. ASHCROFT: HOW ARTISTS AND CREATORS FINALLY GOT THEIR DUE5/19/2003
REALITY BITES: HOW THE BITING REALITY OF PIRACY IN CHINA IS WORKING TO STRENGTHEN ITS COPYRIGHT LAWS2/11/2003
INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDER LIABILITY FOR CONTRIBUTORY TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT AFTER GUCCI12/9/2002
THE EXTRATERRITORIAL REACH OF TRADEMARKS ON THE INTERNET6/4/2002
AN INTERVIEW WITH CASPAR BOWDEN4/30/2002
COURT GIVES THUMBS-UP FOR USE OF THUMBNAIL PICTURES ONLINE4/16/2002
Universal City Studios, Inc. V. Corley : The Constitutional Under Pinnings of Fair Use Remain in Open Question2/14/2002
MUSICNET & PRESSPLAY: TO TRUST OR ANTITRUST?11/12/2001
HACKING DIGITAL VIDEO RECORDERS: POTENTIAL COPYRIGHT LIABILITY FOR DVR HACKERS AND SERVICE PROVIDERS8/17/2001
COPYRIGHTS IN COMPUTER-GENERATED WORKS: WHOM, IF ANYONE, DO WE REWARD?7/11/2001
THE FIRST SALE DOCTRINE AND DIGITAL PHONORECORDS5/31/2001
THE FUTURE OF DATABASE PROTECTION IN U.S. COPYRIGHT LAW5/22/2001
THE FATE OF NAPSTER: DIGITAL DOWNLOADING FACES AN UPHILL BATTLE3/18/2001
CYBERSQUATTING: THE LATEST CHALLENGE IN FEDERAL TRADEMARK PROTECTION2/28/2001
Search:
Related Sites: