Duke Law School shield Duke Law & Technology Review logo
TOPICS
eCommerce
eDiscovery
CyberCrime
International
Media & Comm.
Patents & Tech.
Health & Biotech.
Copyrights & TM.
 
DLTR Home
About DLTR
Contact DLTR
Submissions
Staff
Duke Law
This page has moved. You are being automatically redirected to the new location. If you are not redirected within a few seconds, please find the new page here.
Media & Communications:
RECENT ARTICLES:
THE FUTURE OF "FAIR AND BALANCED": THE FAIRNESS DOCTRINE, NET NEUTRALITY, AND THE INTERNET
  2009 Duke L. & Tech. Rev. 008
Media & Communications
10/26/2009
In recent months, different groups—pundits, politicians, and even an FCC Commissioner—have discussed resurrecting the now-defunct Fairness Doctrine and applying it to Internet communication. This iBrief responds to the novel application of the Doctrine to the Internet in three parts. First, this iBrief will review the history and legal rationale that supported the Fairness Doctrine, with a particular emphasis on emerging technologies. Second, this iBrief applies these legal arguments to the evolving structure of the Internet. Third, this iBrief will consider what we can learn about Net Neutrality through an analogy to the Fairness Doctrine. This iBrief concludes that, while the Fairness Doctrine is not appropriate to use on the Internet in its present form, the arguments for the Doctrine could affect the debate surrounding Net Neutrality, depending on how the Obama Administration implements Net Neutrality.


Archived Articles >>>

Title:

Date Posted
TAXATION OF VIRTUAL ASSETS 5/10/2008
FCC REGULATION: INDECENCY BY INTEREST GROUPS 3/6/2008
IS THE INTERNET A VIABLE THREAT TO REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY? 1/22/2008
T-MOBILE USA, INC. V. DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE FOR BALTIMORE CITY: WHAT THE LATEST SALVO IN DISPROPORTIONAL CELLULAR PHONE TAXATION MEANS FOR THE FUTURE 12/4/2006
WHEN IS EMPLOYEE BLOGGING PROTECTED BY SECTION 7 OF THE NLRA?10/4/2006
THE END OF NET NEUTRALITY7/18/2006
SHIELDING JOURNALIST-"BLOGGERS": THE NEED TO PROTECT NEWSGATHERING DESPITE THE DISTRIBUTION MEDIUM4/7/2006
WHEN DISCRIMINATION IS GOOD: ENCOURAGING BROADBAND INTERNET INVESTMENT WITHOUT CONTENT NEUTRALITY2/20/2006
FIGHTING TERRORISM IN AN ELECTRONIC AGE: DOES THE PATRIOT ACT UNDULY COMPROMISE OUR CIVIL LIBERTIES?1/30/2006
COMPLETING THE CONNECTION: ACHIEVING UNIVERSAL SERVICE THROUGH MUNICIPAL WI-FI1/10/2006
BUGGY WHIPS AND BROADCAST FLAGS: THE NEED FOR A NEW POLITICS OF EXPRESSION10/25/2005
REGULATING INDECENCY: THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATION COMMISSION'S THREAT TO THE FIRST AMENDMENT5/1/2005
CROSSED SIGNALS IN A WIRELESS WORLD: THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT'S MISAPPLICATION OF THE COMPLETE PREEMPTION DOCTRINE11/16/2004
WIRELESS LOCAL NUMBER PORTABILITY: NEW RULES WILL HAVE BROAD EFFECTS6/9/2004
INVESTIGATING TERRORISM: THE ROLE OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT 1/14/2004
THE FCC UNDER ATTACK8/26/2003
THE FCC AND CONGRESS SHOULD CONSIDER CONSUMER RIGHTS WHEN MAKING THE TRANSITION TO DTV8/4/2003
DO NOT ADVERTISE: THE CURRENT FIGHT AGAINST UNSOLICITED ADVERTISEMENTS4/29/2003
POLITICAL E-MAIL: PROTECTED SPEECH OR UNWELCOME SPAM?1/14/2003
MUSIC PIRACY AND THE AUDIO HOME RECORDING ACT11/20/2002
“VIRTUAL CHILD” PORNOGRAPHY ON THE INTERNET: A “VIRTUAL” VICTIM?9/23/2002
NEW “UNBUNDLING” RULES: WILL THE FCC FINALLY OPEN UP CABLE BROADBAND?9/9/2002
EVERYONE'S A CRITIC: DEFAMATION AND ANONYMITY ON THE INTERNET3/14/2002
ENHANCED 911 TECHNOLOGY AND PRIVACY CONCERNS: HOW HAS THE BALANCE CHANGED SINCE SEPTEMBER 11?10/26/2001
HARD LESSONS: GUIDING AMERICA'S APPROACH TO THIRD GENERATION WIRELESS POLICY9/14/2001
THE MUSIC ONLINE COMPETITION ACT OF 2001: MODERATE CHANGE OR RADICAL REFORM?8/31/2001
FREELANCE ARTICLES AND ELECTRONIC DATABASES: WHO OWNS THE COPYRIGHTS?7/18/2001
DIGITAL TELEVISION: HAS THE REVOLUTION STALLED?3/26/2001
ICANN: THE DEBATE OVER GOVERNING THE INTERNET2/14/2001
AN INTERVIEW WITH MICHAEL FROOMKIN2/28/2001
Search:
Related Sites: