The Supreme Court has held Section 5 to be Constitutional in the past on the premise that it was needed, but that Congress would need to reconsider the justification for it when renewed. In 2006, Congress renewed the Voting Rights Act including Section 5 in full without any analysis of whether Federal pre-clearance of local election law changes is still serving a needed purpose. Should the constitutionality of Section 5 be upheld in light of current statistics? SCOTUS will decide in Shelby County v. Holder. For more information, please contact email@example.com
Is Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act Still Needed?
- Remembering Harry R. Chadwick Jr.: '53 grad had rich career in public service and private practice, established Duke Law's first endowed professorship Anderson McQueen
- Prak '80 inducted into North Carolina Association of Broadcasters Hall of Fame Brooks Pierce
- Willett JD/MA '92 named to "Fastcase 50" list of "innovators, visionaries, and leaders" Fastcase 50